Do Jack Wolfskin cycling rain jackets have PFAS?
Jack Wolfskin cycling rain jackets average 20 out of 100 on PFAS Authority's PFAS and toxin screen across the 4 Jack Wolfskin cycling rain jackets graded as of October 2026, level with the 20 out of 100 median for the 20 other cycling rain jackets brands graded alongside it.
Jack Wolfskin cycling rain jackets average Bad on our four-band scale. None of them clear our buy threshold. That is above 48% of the cycling rain jackets brands we grade.
PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Which Jack Wolfskin cycling rain jackets contain PFAS? Poor and Bad, we’d swap these
- Polyamide with water-repellent coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Jack Wolfskin does not disclose whether the water-repellent coating is PFAS-based or PFAS-free.…
- 3-layer textile with water-repellent coating finish, specific chemistry undisclosed
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Undisclosed water-repellent coating finish on a 3-layer jacket strongly suggests fluorinated water…
5 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- polyamide shell with unspecified water-repellent coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. The unspecified water-repellent coating finish on the polyamide shell may contain legacy perfluorinated…
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Polyamide with water-repellent coating, composition unspecified
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- PFAS. Polyamide rainwear with unspecified water-repellent coating formulations commonly contain legacy PFCs…
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonBetter cycling rain jackets from other brands
Graded higher than the Jack Wolfskin average of 20.
- polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Azo dyes and color fastness
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- PFAS
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonThe same question, asked of the other cycling rain jackets brands
Best average grade first. Jack Wolfskin averages 20.
See every Jack Wolfskin product we grade on the Jack Wolfskin brand page, or the full cycling rain jackets ranking.