Perfect Protection Cool Touch Mattress Protector, Is It Non-Toxic?
Contact the brand for treatment specs and material data before buying.
The 'Cool Touch' feature suggests a synthetic waterproof backing, likely polyurethane-based, but the brand provides no public statement about its specific composition or PFAS content.
The better-graded swap
Avocado Green Mattress
Organic Cotton Mattress Cover and Pad Protector
85/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Polyurethane or synthetic membrane waterproof backing (unspecified)
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Is Perfect Protection Cool Touch Protector non-toxic? What it is made of
Cool Touch uses a polyurethane or synthetic membrane waterproof backing, likely combined with a polyester or cotton fabric face. Polyurethane foams and films can release volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and early use, though risk is generally lower than legacy vinyl or PVC. The waterproofing layer is the primary concern, composition details are not publicly disclosed, making it impossible to rule out PFAS-based durable water repellents (DWRs), which are common in budget mattress protectors.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) from polyurethane
Polyurethane backing and adhesives may off-gas formaldehyde or other VOCs, particularly in the first weeks of use. The brand does not provide off-gassing test data or air quality certifications.
PFAS
No public material disclosure; waterproof membranes in this price category typically use fluorinated compounds. Brand silence on treatment chemistry is consistent with PFAS-based DWRs being standard in budget protectors.
Source, ATSDR ↗Coating degradation and secondary leaching
Polyurethane membranes degrade with heat and washing cycles, potentially releasing breakdown products or exposing adhesives. Lack of durability data makes long-term leaching risk unclear.
Microplastic shedding
If the face is polyester and backing is degrading plastic film, washing may shed microfibers. No washing-shedding data is available for this product.
What’s reassuring
Azo dyes in fabric face
Fabric composition not specified; if polyester, may contain azo dyes used in low-cost textiles, though no specific brand violations are documented.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
The brand markets toward allergy sufferers and emphasizes dust-mite and allergen blocking but does not publish material safety data sheets or certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS) on their website. The brand has taken no public stance on PFAS avoidance or phased-out treatments. No major recalls or safety controversies are documented for this specific model, but the company's silence on chemical treatment specifics is a red flag for a product that explicitly claims waterproofing.
How it compares in its category
Mattress protectors in this price tier typically use polyurethane or PVC-based membranes and often rely on PFAS to achieve durable water repellency. The brand's lack of third-party certification places it below OEKO-TEX or GlobalPETG-certified competitors, which undergo independent chemical testing. Premium alternatives (e.g., Helix, Avocado) disclose fabric treatments more transparently, while budget options from other brands often share the same opacity about waterproofing chemistry.
If you buy it
Contact directly before purchase and request material composition data, including whether the waterproof backing contains PFAS, fluorine-based treatments, or other durable water repellents. Unpack and air the protector in a well-ventilated space for 24-48 hours before placing on your mattress to allow any VOCs to off-gas. Wash per label instructions (typically cold water, gentle cycle) and avoid high heat drying, which can accelerate polyurethane degradation. Replace if the backing begins to crack, peel, or delaminate, as this increases leaching risk.
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Perfect Protection Cool Touch Mattress Protector?
- organic cotton
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- No PFAS statement found from the brand
- Organic cotton
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Waterproofing chemical exposure
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
- 100% linen, no reported coating
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Heavy metals
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
More mattress protectors grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.