PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Bogner Men's Eason Ski Jacket

Bogner · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Bogner Men's Eason Ski Jacket

Bad

Ski jacket with water-repellent coating; PFAS status unclear from brand

Verdict: SkipPolyester ski jacket with water-repellent coating carries unclear PFAS burden and standard synthetic textile risks; Bogner's silent stance limits transparency.

Bogner does not publicly disclose PFAS or water-repellent coating chemistry for this jacket. Ski jackets typically use water-repellent treatments, often PFAS-based, but brand transparency is absent here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating chemistry

water-repellent coating on polyester ski jackets traditionally uses fluorocarbon (PFAS-based) compounds. Bogner has not disclosed whether this jacket uses legacy or PFAS-free water-repellent coating, so the specific chemical hazard profile is unclear from publicly available information.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester production sometimes involves antimony as a catalyst. At standard clothing levels, skin exposure is minimal; however, degraded or damaged fibers could theoretically increase exposure. This is a general polyester concern, not specific to Bogner's sourcing.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

As water-repellent coating wears or flakes with use and washing, small synthetic particles may shed into wash water and the environment. This is a general risk for all coated synthetic jackets and intensifies if the coating is damaged or re-treated improperly.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes and synthetic colorants

Bogner is a European premium brand subject to REACH and EU textile regulations, which restrict certain azo dyes. No specific recall or contamination reported for this product; polyester dyes are generally lower risk than natural fiber alternatives if manufacturer complies with standards.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based wrinkle-resistant finishes are typical on ski jackets. Polyester does not normally require formaldehyde resins. Not identified as a concern for this product category.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Eason jacket is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS compounds (fluorocarbons) to achieve water shedding, though some manufacturers now use PFAS-free alternatives; Bogner has not publicly specified which type this jacket uses. Polyester itself is stable under normal wear, but the water-repellent coating is the chemical concern here, particularly if it sheds or degrades with washing and use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bogner is a premium alpine sports brand with no published chemical disclosure policy or PFAS commitment on record. The company has not issued statements about water-repellent coating chemistry in its products or phased reduction timelines. This silence is notable given that major outdoor competitors (Patagonia, Arc'teryx) have adopted PFAS-free alternatives or transparent chemical pledges. Without direct communication from Bogner, the specific water-repellent coating formulation in this jacket cannot be verified.

How it compares in its category

Most ski jackets in this price tier use water-repellent coating coatings, but leading competitors increasingly market PFAS-free versions or provide chemical transparency. Bogner's lack of public commitment puts this jacket in a middling position: it is not exceptional for safety disclosure, though nor is it alone in the market. Budget alternatives sometimes omit water-repellent coating entirely (trading water resistance for lower chemical risk), while premium eco-focused brands explicitly use fluorocarbon-free coatings.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water with mild detergent and avoid dry cleaning, which can damage the water-repellent coating layer and release coating particles. Limit washing frequency to preserve the water-repellent coating; spot-clean when possible. If water beading noticeably decreases after 1-2 seasons, the coating has degraded and should not be re-treated at home with spray-on water-repellent coating products (further chemical exposure). Consider contacting Bogner directly to request water-repellent coating formulation details before purchase if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bogner has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.