PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall6/ 100Bad
Bogner Zila Insulated Ski Jacket Women's

Bogner · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Bogner Zila Insulated Ski Jacket Women's

Bad

water-repellent coating apparel typical PFAS risk; no brand disclosure available.

Verdict: SkipPolyester ski jacket with water-repellent coating carries documented PFAS risk; non-PFAS hazards minor if maintained properly. Choose only if aware of water-treatment tradeoff.

Bogner Zila is a premium insulated ski jacket with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish, standard in performance outerwear. Bogner provides no public PFAS information; water-repellent coating treatments commonly use PFAS, but specifics unknown here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating waterproof treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Polyester microplastic shedding

Polyester textiles shed fibers during washing and wear, especially if the water-repellent coating degrades or is abraded. Ski jackets see high mechanical stress (zippers, backpack friction, falls) that accelerates this process. The extent of microplastic release from Bogner Zila specifically is not quantified in public data.

70/ 100

water-repellent coating durability and degradation

Polyester water-repellent coating coatings are known to lose effectiveness after 20-50 wash cycles depending on water hardness and detergent type. As the coating wears, exposed polyester may shed more freely. Bogner does not specify the water-repellent coating formulation (fluorinated vs. fluorine-free) or expected lifespan for the Zila.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Bogner, as a premium European brand, typically sources polyester that meets EU textile standards (REACH, Oeko-Tex certification is not confirmed). No specific recalls or hazard reports are on record for the Zila regarding dye contamination or formaldehyde-releasing resins.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The Zila may carry printed branding; if so, pigments could theoretically contain heavy metals. No published test data or recalls for Bogner apparel indicate this is a concern, and premium ski jackets typically use compliant printing inks.

Source: FDA
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Polyester itself does not require added flame retardants. If the jacket uses a synthetic insulation fill (e.g., down alternative), that material may contain brominated or phosphate-based flame retardants, but Bogner does not disclose insulation chemistry for the Zila, and no hazard alerts are documented.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Zila uses polyester as its shell fabric with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the surface. Polyester itself is stable and does not leach chemicals under normal wear, but the water-repellent coating, nearly universal on ski jackets, is the source of PFAS concern. water-repellent coating treatments create a water-resistant barrier by depositing long-chain fluorinated compounds that persist in the environment and bioaccumulate; this is distinct from the base fabric hazard.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bogner has not publicly disclosed whether the Zila uses PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternatives or traditional fluorinated formulations. The company does not appear to have published a comprehensive chemical transparency statement or commitment to phase out PFAS in apparel. This silence is typical of mid-to-premium ski wear brands, which have been slower to adopt alternatives than some outdoor competitors.

How it compares in its category

Most insulated ski jackets in this price range (premium European brands) use similar polyester-water-repellent coating constructions. Alternatives exist: brands like Arc'teryx and Patagonia now offer jackets with fluorine-free water-repellent coating (Parylene or wax-based), though Bogner does not advertise such options for this model. If PFAS avoidance is a priority, this jacket does not position itself as a low-PFAS choice.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cool water with mild detergent to avoid accelerating water-repellent coating degradation; avoid hot water and tumble drying, which break down the coating and increase fiber shedding. Do not dry-clean, as solvents can strip the finish. Replace the jacket if the water-repellent coating visibly fails (water no longer beads on the shell) or if seams separate, as worn coatings shed microfibers. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bogner has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.