20Bad

Burton Review, Is Burton Non-Toxic?

PFAS Authority is a scoring system, not a laboratory. We do not test products ourselves. Grades are model-based, built from published ingredients, materials, certifications, brand disclosures and third-party lab results where they exist. See the rubric.

Across 2 graded products, Burton averages Bad (20/100). On disclosure, the brand says nothing publicly about PFAS. None of its products grade Good or better yet. Grades are model-based estimates, not lab results.

Graded and flagged Poor and Bad, we’d swap these

Burton Men's Ballast GORE-TEX 2L Pants

Burton

Men's Ballast GORE-TEX 2L Pants

GORE-TEX 2L membrane laminate (polytetrafluoroethylene-based)

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade6Bad
♾️

Teflon-type coating thermal decomposition (fume risk)

GORE-TEX 2L contains Teflon-type coating; improper care (hot tumble drying, ironing, dry…

70

Coating or membrane degradation over time

GORE-TEX membranes can degrade after 3-5 years of heavy use or UV exposure, reducing…

45

Avoid if concerned about PFAS; Teflon-type coating membrane carries risk and Burton discloses nothing.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Burton Men's Reserve 2L 3-In-1 Pants

Burton

Men's Reserve 2L 3-In-1 Pants

Nylon/polyester shell with water-repellent coating water-resistant finish

PFAS Grade20Bad
Overall Grade12Bad
🍳

water-repellent coating chemistry (fluorinated or non-fluorinated unknown)

Burton does not disclose whether this pants' water-repellent coating finish uses legacy…

70
💨

VOC off-gassing from adhesives and coatings

3-in-1 construction with multiple bonded layers (shell, mid-layer, lining) involves…

70

Avoid or contact Burton, silent on PFAS in a waterproof jacket where water-repellent coating matters most.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

Every grade uses the same public rubric. How grades work →