PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Calphalon Nonstick Bakeware 10-Piece Set

Calphalon · Non-Stick Baking Molds

Calphalon Nonstick Bakeware 10-Piece Set

Bad

Nonstick coating type not disclosed; PFAS risk unclear, higher caution advised.

Verdict: SkipNonstick coating type undisclosed; Teflon-type coating fume risk and PFAS status unclear. Use with caution and monitor for coating wear.

Calphalon doesn't specify whether this bakeware uses Teflon-type coating or other Teflon-family coating. Standard nonstick cookware frequently contains PFAS, and the brand offers no transparency here.

The safe swap

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

Calphalon

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating thermal decomposition (fume risk)

If coating contains Teflon-type coating, overheating above 500F can release perfluorinated gases; risk is real only if composition is Teflon-type coating-based, which Calphalon has not confirmed or denied for this set.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and substrate exposure

Nonstick bakeware coatings commonly chip or peel with age or aggressive cleaning. Once compromised, aluminum or steel substrate may contact food; no test data exists for this specific model, but degradation is a known failure mode across nonstick baking molds.

45/ 100
🔩

Aluminum leaching (if aluminum substrate)

If the substrate is aluminum and coating fails, direct aluminum-food contact is possible at high temperatures. Calphalon does not confirm substrate material, so this risk cannot be ruled out; typical for budget nonstick bakeware.

70/ 100
🏷️

Lack of material transparency

Calphalon's refusal to specify whether coating is Teflon-type coating, ceramic, or proprietary blend is a documented industry practice but increases consumer inability to assess chemical exposure. This opacity is a known issue with many major nonstick brands.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Calphalon does not publicly specify whether this bakeware uses Teflon-type coating (Teflon-type) or ceramic nonstick coatings. The unspecified formulation creates ambiguity around thermal stability and chemical composition. Steel or aluminum substrate under the coating is typical for this product class, but substrate material is also not detailed in standard product documentation. Without material transparency, risk assessment relies on general nonstick coating hazards rather than product-specific data.

The brand's record and disclosure

Calphalon (owned by Groupe SEB) maintains no public stance on PFAS use or phase-out in this product line. The brand does not disclose coating chemistry on retail listings or safety documentation for this bakeware set. Calphalon has faced no major recalls specific to this bakeware set, but the company's historical opacity on nonstick composition is notable. No third-party certifications (Greenguard, GOTS, etc.) are claimed for this product.

How it compares in its category

Nonstick bakeware sets vary widely: ceramic-coated alternatives (e.g., GreenPan, Caraway) disclose PFOA/Teflon-type coating-free status; silicone or parchment are fully inert alternatives; traditional Teflon-type coating coatings remain common and affordable but lack transparency. Calphalon's refusal to specify coating type places it in the middle-risk category for nonstick bakeware, where PFAS content cannot be ruled out. Comparable unspecified nonstick brands (T-fal, Circulon) share this disclosure gap.

If you buy it

Keep oven temperature at manufacturer maximum (usually 350-400F); do not preheat empty. Inspect coating annually for chips, peeling, or discoloration and replace if visible damage occurs. Hand-wash rather than dishwasher to extend coating life. Use silicone or wood utensils only. If the coating begins to flake or you smell chemical odors when heating, discontinue use immediately.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Calphalon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Non-Stick Baking Molds

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

Calphalon

Square Savarin Silicone Baking Mold

Food-grade silicone

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade68Good

Degradation and brittleness over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold and bacterial colonization

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Odor and flavor absorption

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; silicone baking molds don't typically contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

Calphalon

Silicone Baking Mold (Alphabet)

Silicone (food-grade)

PFAS Grade80Excellent
Overall Grade72Good
🫧

Silicone degradation and microparticle shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial colonization if improperly stored

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Silicone baking molds rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold

Calphalon

Cobblestone Pan Silicone Baking & Freezing Mold

food-grade silicone

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
⛏️

Silicone oligomer leaching

Limited concern

70

Coating or surface degradation over time

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth if not dried properly

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern; silicone molds rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

More non-stick baking molds grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.