PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall16/ 100Bad
Colgate Total Waxed Dental Floss

Colgate · Dental Floss

Colgate Total Waxed Dental Floss

Poor

Lower concern, but wax coating origins unclear; no brand PFAS disclosure.

Verdict: SkipColgate Total Waxed Floss poses no established non-PFAS hazards; nylon and wax are inert in mouth use; standard dental product with no safety recalls on record.

Dental floss with wax coating for water resistance. Colgate provides no PFAS information. Nylon and wax are typically PFAS-free, but coating source unspecified.

The safe swap

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon floss with wax coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🍳

Heavy metals

Wax origin (petroleum-derived paraffin vs. beeswax vs. plant wax blend) is not disclosed by Colgate. If mineral oil-based, residual heavy metal contamination is theoretically possible but not reported. Beeswax carries no known toxicological concern. Without independent testing or brand disclosure, this remains speculative.

Source: FDA
70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Wax coatings on dental floss may contain fluorinated additives or may be manufactured using PFAS-based processing agents; Colgate does not disclose. This product received a PFAS safety grade of 30/100 (Poor) due to opaque sourcing. See separate PFAS assessment.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Nylon microfiber ingestion

Nylon floss does not shed microfibers during normal use; breakage is rare and pieces that might detach are too large to be inhaled or cause GI obstruction in adults. No documented incidents recorded for this product line.

95/ 100

Gum abrasion or irritation from floss material

Nylon and wax are well-tolerated by oral soft tissues. Irritation is caused by aggressive flossing technique, not material toxicity. No sensitization or allergic reactions are documented for this product.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Colgate Total Waxed Floss is typically white/light colored and formulations do not require formaldehyde-based resins or hazardous azo dyes for this application. No evidence of such additives has surfaced in available safety literature.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Colgate Total Waxed Floss is nylon filament coated with wax (likely paraffin or beeswax blend, composition not fully disclosed by brand). Nylon is a synthetic polymer that does not leach plasticizers or bisphenols during normal use in the mouth because it remains at oral temperature and is not heated. The wax coating reduces fraying and improves glide but is not ingested in meaningful quantity; small amounts swallowed pose negligible toxicological risk given wax's inertness in the GI tract.

The brand's record and disclosure

Colgate-Palmolive maintains modest transparency on oral care formulations but does not publish detailed material sourcing or PFAS testing for floss products. No recalls or safety alerts specific to Colgate Total Waxed Floss exist in FDA or consumer safety databases. The brand has faced historical scrutiny on triclosan and microbeads in other products, but Colgate Total Waxed Floss contains neither. Colgate does not claim PFAS-free status for this product, and wax origin remains undisclosed.

How it compares in its category

Waxed nylon floss is the most common form globally and carries no recognized safety disadvantage versus unwaxed nylon or silk alternatives. Silk floss is biodegradable but often coated with the same wax types. Colgate's product is mid-range in category and does not stand out as higher or lower risk than store-brand waxed nylon floss. Water flossers and tape options present no material safety advantage for this hazard class.

If you buy it

Use as directed: floss once daily, use gentle sawing motions to avoid gum trauma. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent wax softening (not a practical concern in normal bathrooms). Discard the entire spool once the wax coat visibly degrades or becomes sticky; typically every 12 months. Do not heat floss or store near direct sunlight. Small amounts of wax swallowed during use are harmless; no ingestion risk exists under normal flossing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 62% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Colgate has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Dental floss (plant-based or silk) and glass case

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if floss is stored damp

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Floss and glass are inherently PFAS-free materials.

Risky category by default

Waterpik Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Waterpik

Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Plastic housing, ABS/nylon components, stainless steel tip, silicone seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Silicone seal breakdown and leaching

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial biofilm in water reservoir

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Electronic component exposure if housing cracks

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern water flosser; no known PFAS-prone materials.

Risky category by default

Burst Refillable Expanding Mint Dental Floss Set

Floss & Ploss

Burst Refillable Expanding Mint Dental Floss Set

Nylon dental floss, likely polyester core

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (mint flavoring)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during use

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Coating or wax additives (undisclosed)

Limited concern

70

Low PFAS risk, but brand silence limits assurance.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.