PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Coreshot Shell Jacket

Columbia · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Columbia Men's Coreshot Shell Jacket

Bad

water-repellent coating treatment unknown; Columbia silent on PFAS disclosure.

Verdict: SkipNylon shell with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry and Columbia's silent PFAS stance create transparency risk; non-PFAS hazards are minor if cared for properly.

Columbia does not publicly disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this jacket. water-repellent coating-treated outerwear often uses PFAS, but specific treatment chemistry is undisclosed. Request brand clarification before purchase.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Nylon water-repellent coating finishes degrade with washing and wear, potentially shedding polymer particles and finish residue. If the water-repellent coating is PFAS-based (unknown for this product), degradation products may enter wastewater. Extent of harm depends on unknown finish chemistry.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from synthetic finishes

New nylon jackets with water-repellent coating and any applied adhesives or linings may off-gas volatile compounds during the first few wears or when heated. Airing out the jacket outdoors before first wear can reduce exposure. This is typical for outdoor gear but intensity is unknown without finish disclosure.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public reports or recalls of formaldehyde contamination in Columbia nylon shells. The black or standard colorways typical of this jacket are lower-risk for azo dye issues compared to deep or reactive dyes, but Columbia does not disclose dye standards.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Azo dyes / non-compliant colorants

Columbia complies with REACH and CPSIA basic dye restrictions, but does not publish detailed colorant audits. Risk is low for standard colors but unverified for specialty finishes or recent production batches.

95/ 100

Antimony in polyester blends

This jacket is listed as nylon shell with no reported polyester content, so antimony catalyst contamination is not relevant.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses nylon as the outer shell, a synthetic polymer valued for durability and water resistance. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the nylon surface is the key unknown: Columbia does not publicly disclose whether this treatment contains PFAS-based chemistries (like C8 fluorocarbons) or newer alternatives. Nylon itself is stable under normal wear and does not leach hazardous chemicals, but the finish chemistry is opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia Sportswear has not published a clear PFAS elimination timeline or water-repellent coating material disclosure comparable to brands like Patagonia or Arc'teryx. The company has faced no major recalls or documented safety crises with this product line, but the lack of transparency on water-repellent chemistry is a red flag in an industry where PFAS-free alternatives are increasingly available. Columbia's silence suggests either legacy PFAS use or indifference to consumer disclosure demands.

How it compares in its category

Most mid-market outdoor shell jackets still use fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating finishes, making Columbia typical rather than ahead of the curve. Premium brands (Patagonia, Rab, some Arc'teryx lines) now offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating or wax-based water resistance, while budget options often use untested finishes. This jacket sits in the murky middle: competent performance, conventional (likely problematic) chemistry, no commitment to safer alternatives.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket separately in cold water with minimal agitation to reduce fiber shedding and preserve the water-repellent coating as long as possible. Avoid dry cleaning, which can degrade the finish and concentrate any water-repellent coating residue. Do not expose to prolonged heat (dryer on high, ironing, or direct sunlight for weeks) as this may compromise the nylon and accelerate coating breakdown. Re-water-repellent coating treatment at end-of-life should use a PFAS-free product if available (brands like Nikwax offer alternatives).

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.