Columbia · Ski & Snowboard Jackets
Columbia Men's Coreshot Shell Jacket
water-repellent coating treatment unknown; Columbia silent on PFAS disclosure.
Columbia does not publicly disclose PFAS use or avoidance in this jacket. water-repellent coating-treated outerwear often uses PFAS, but specific treatment chemistry is undisclosed. Request brand clarification before purchase.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Nylon shell with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
What Columbia Men's Coreshot Shell Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials
This jacket uses nylon as the outer shell, a synthetic polymer valued for durability and water resistance. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the nylon surface is the key unknown, Columbia does not publicly disclose whether this treatment contains PFAS-based chemistries (like C8 fluorocarbons) or newer alternatives. Nylon itself is stable under normal wear and does not leach hazardous chemicals, but the finish chemistry is opaque.
What’s concerning
Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment
Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Microplastics
Nylon water-repellent coating finishes degrade with washing and wear, potentially shedding polymer particles and finish residue. If the water-repellent coating is PFAS-based (unknown for this product), degradation products may enter wastewater. Extent of harm depends on unknown finish chemistry.
Source, EPA ↗VOC off-gassing from synthetic finishes
New nylon jackets with water-repellent coating and any applied adhesives or linings may off-gas volatile compounds during the first few wears or when heated. Airing out the jacket outdoors before first wear can reduce exposure. This is typical for outdoor gear but intensity is unknown without finish disclosure.
What’s reassuring
Formaldehyde / VOCs
No public reports or recalls of formaldehyde contamination in Columbia nylon shells. The black or standard colorways typical of this jacket are lower-risk for azo dye issues compared to deep or reactive dyes, but Columbia does not disclose dye standards.
Source, ATSDR ↗Azo dyes / non-compliant colorants
Columbia complies with REACH and CPSIA basic dye restrictions, but does not publish detailed colorant audits. Risk is low for standard colors but unverified for specialty finishes or recent production batches.
Antimony in polyester blends
This jacket is listed as nylon shell with no reported polyester content, so antimony catalyst contamination is not relevant.
How is this PFAS grade calculated?
The brand's record and disclosure
Columbia Sportswear has not published a clear PFAS elimination timeline or water-repellent coating material disclosure comparable to brands like Patagonia or Arc'teryx. The company has faced no major recalls or documented safety crises with this product line, but the lack of transparency on water-repellent chemistry is a red flag in an industry where alternatives with lower PFAS concern are increasingly available. Columbia's silence suggests either legacy PFAS use or indifference to consumer disclosure demands.
How it compares in its category
Most mid-market outdoor shell jackets still use fluorocarbon-based water-repellent coating finishes, making Columbia typical rather than ahead of the curve. Premium brands (Patagonia, Rab, some Arc'teryx lines) now offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating or wax-based water resistance, while budget options often use untested finishes. This jacket sits in the murky middle, competent performance, conventional chemistry linked to PFAS concerns, no commitment to lower-concern alternatives.
If you buy it
Wash the jacket separately in cold water with minimal agitation to reduce fiber shedding and preserve the water-repellent coating as long as possible. Avoid dry cleaning, which can degrade the finish and concentrate any water-repellent coating residue. Do not expose to prolonged heat (dryer on high, ironing, or direct sunlight for weeks) as this may compromise the nylon and accelerate coating breakdown. Re-water-repellent coating treatment at end-of-life should use a PFAS-free product if available (brands like Nikwax offer alternatives).
What is not known about PFAS in this product?
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Columbia has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Columbia Men's Coreshot Shell Jacket?
- Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
Allbirds
Jackets & Coats Allbirds Men's Trino Puffer Jacket Full Zip Wool Blend Forest Green Coat Size Sm
- wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry
2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on Amazon
- Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue
3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.
Find an alternative on AmazonMore ski & snowboard jackets grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.