PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Columbia Men's Whirlibird V Interchange Jacket

Columbia · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Columbia Men's Whirlibird V Interchange Jacket

Bad

Typical interchange jacket; water-repellent coating likely contains PFAS. Brand silent on chemistry.

Verdict: SkipPFAS-laden water-repellent coating is the primary concern; polyester/nylon base itself carries low chemical risk if not overheated. Buy only if you accept PFAS exposure and commit to proper care.

Columbia does not disclose PFAS use or absence in this jacket. The water-repellent coating water-repellent treatment is standard industry practice, historically PFAS-based, though some brands now use alternatives. No lab testing or third-party verification available.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester/nylon with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

PFAS content is the primary hazard; no PFAS grade available from Columbia. Washing, wear, and degradation can mobilize these compounds. See separate PFAS assessment (20/100).

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in polyester/nylon coloring

Polyester garments may use azo dyes, some of which are restricted in EU but permitted in North America. No specific data for this product; risk is typical for mainstream dyed synthetics at this price tier.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony is used as a catalyst in polyester production and can remain as residue. Skin contact risk is low; risk increases if fibers degrade or are ingested. No specific testing disclosed by Columbia.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester/nylon blends may use formaldehyde-based finishing for wrinkle resistance or color fastness. Outgassing is typically minimal after initial production curing, but cannot be ruled out without access to finishing specifications.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fiber

Washing any polyester/nylon garment releases microplastics into wastewater. The water-repellent coating may increase shedding if it degrades; cold washing and air drying reduce this somewhat.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Whirlibird V uses polyester and nylon outer shells with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish. That water-repellent coating is almost certainly PFAS-based, given Columbia's silent stance and the industry norm for mid-range interchange jackets. The polyester and nylon themselves are stable polymers with low leaching risk at normal wear temperatures, but the water-repellent coating finish is where chemical exposure occurs, particularly if you wash the jacket repeatedly or expose it to heat.

The brand's record and disclosure

Columbia has not publicly committed to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or disclosed the specific chemistry of its water-repellent coatings. The brand has no published certifications (Bluesign, OEKO-TEX, GOTS) for this product line that would signal safer chemical practices. Columbia's silence on water-repellent coating ingredients is typical for mainstream outdoor brands but contrasts with competitors like Patagonia, which has phased toward fluorine-free water repellents on many garments.

How it compares in its category

Interchange jackets at this price point almost universally use PFAS-based water-repellent coating; the Whirlibird V is not an outlier. Premium brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia higher-end lines) increasingly offer fluorine-free alternatives, but they cost significantly more. If PFAS-free water-repellent coating is a priority, you would need to seek out specific product lines certified fluorine-free or choose untreated synthetics, accepting reduced water repellency.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and use cold water with mild detergent to minimize water-repellent coating reactivation treatments and leaching. Avoid heat drying; air dry completely. Do not dry clean. Replace the jacket if the outer coating shows visible degradation (cracking, peeling, loss of beading), as this increases microparticle and PFAS release. Store in a dry place to reduce washing frequency. Be aware that rewaterproofing sprays reintroduce PFAS; hand-wash only if needed.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Columbia has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.