PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Gelish Glamour Queen Soak-Off Gel Polish

Gelish · Nail Polish & Top Coat

Gelish Glamour Queen Soak-Off Gel Polish

Poor

Skip until brand discloses ingredients or testing confirms safety.

Verdict: SkipGelish gel polish carries unresolved PFAS concerns plus typical nail product chemical load; use only with good ventilation and patch test.

This gel polish uses a proprietary, undisclosed formulation. Gelish makes no PFAS claims, and gel polishes commonly contain fluorinated resins.

The safe swap

Ella+Mila What The Gel? Gel-Like Top Coat

Ella+Mila

Ella+Mila What The Gel? Gel-Like Top Coat

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

proprietary gel polish formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

Has a special coating but the exact formula is secret.

75/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Uncrosslinked acrylate monomers and oligomers

Gel polishes by design may not achieve 100% crosslinking during UV/LED cure. Residual monomers can leach onto skin or be absorbed through nails, particularly in warm/moist conditions (sweat, water exposure). Gelish does not disclose cure efficiency or residual monomer limits, making risk assessment speculative but category-standard.

20/ 100
⚠️

Contact sensitization and allergic dermatitis

Photoinitiators (commonly benzophenone and camphorquinone) in gel polishes are documented skin allergens. Gelish formulation is not publicly disclosed, so specific initiators are unknown. Users report occasional nail bed redness and cuticle irritation; formal incidence rate for Gelish is not published but consistent with gel polish category.

45/ 100
⚠️

Acetone exposure during removal

Soak-off removal requires 10-15 minutes of acetone immersion. Repeated exposure is associated with nail thinning, skin irritation, and CNS effects at high dose. Gelish removal requires standard acetone protocols; individual risk depends on frequency of manicures and personal sensitivity. No Gelish-specific mitigation has been published.

20/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and solvent emissions

Gel polish bottles contain monomers and solvents that volatilize, particularly if caps are left loose or product is stored in warm conditions. Gelish does not publish VOC content or off-gas emissions. Exposure is typically brief during application but cumulative for frequent users or salon workers in poorly ventilated spaces.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No Gelish product has been tested for lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals in pigments or UV absorbers. Many gel polishes contain mineral-derived colorants that may carry trace metals. Lack of testing does not confirm safety; it reflects industry-wide transparency gap in nail products.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Gelish Glamour Queen is a soak-off gel polish based on oligomeric acrylates and methacrylates cured under UV/LED light. Like all gel polishes, it contains initiators, resins, and pigments that require solvent extraction (acetone) for removal. The proprietary formulation is not fully disclosed publicly, making independent hazard assessment difficult. Soak-off gels are designed to remain on the nail for 2-3 weeks, creating prolonged skin contact with uncrosslinked monomers and additives that may leach during wear.

The brand's record and disclosure

Gelish (owned by Essie/L'Oreal) does not publicly disclose ingredient lists or provide third-party safety testing results for PFAS or other concern chemicals. The brand has not responded to industry calls for reformulation transparency or obtained eco-certifications like Nailbox or 13 Free standards. No major recalls have been documented for Gelish products, but absence of disclosure does not indicate absence of risk. The brand's silence on PFAS and heavy-metal testing is a significant gap given regulatory attention to nail products in California and Canada.

How it compares in its category

Gelish occupies the mid-premium segment; it is chemically similar to OPI and Shellac but less transparent than newer brands (Zoya, Ella+Mila) that publish ingredient decks and PFAS testing. Most gel polishes contain acrylate monomers and photoinitiators; Gelish offers no documented advantage in reduced chemical load. The category-wide issue is that UV curing does not guarantee all monomers cross-link completely, leaving potential allergens and leachables on the nail. Soak-off gels universally require acetone removal, which is a significant exposure point often underestimated by consumers.

If you buy it

Always apply in a well-ventilated space or near a fan to reduce inhalation of volatile compounds and photoinitiator dust. Avoid skin contact; use a cuticle barrier or tape around the nail to limit leaching onto surrounding skin. Do not wear the polish continuously for more than 3 weeks; remove it with acetone-soaked pads rather than peeling, which damages the nail plate. Patch test first if you have a history of contact dermatitis or fragrance sensitivity. Consider rotating brands or taking acetone-free breaks between applications to limit cumulative exposure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Gelish has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Nail Polish & Top Coat

Opi GELement

OPI

GELement

gel polish (acrylates, oligomers, resins)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
⚠️

UV/LED light exposure (cumulative)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Unreacted acrylate monomers (contact sensitization)

Limited concern

70
💨

Respiratory irritation from uncured vapors during application

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Nail plate thinning and brittleness (physical damage from removal)

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern for PFAS; no brand transparency on formula.

Risky category by default

Ella+Mila What The Gel? Gel-Like Top Coat

Ella+Mila

What The Gel? Gel-Like Top Coat

gel-like acrylate polymer top coat

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade63Good
💨

Acrylate monomer exposure (skin/inhalation)

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and solvent inhalation

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Uncured polymer residue and skin sensitization

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern cosmetic; brand offers no PFAS transparency.

Risky category by default

ella +mila Jelly Collection Vegan Quick-Dry Nail Polish

Ella+Mila

ella +mila Jelly Collection Vegan Quick-Dry Nail Polish

organic pigments, resins, solvents in vegan nail lacquer

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
💨

Volatile organic solvent inhalation (toluene, xylene, or replacements)

High concern

20
🧠

Lead

Limited concern

70
🧴

Phthalates

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; vegan formulas typically avoid Teflon-family coating.

Risky category by default

More nail polish & top coat grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.