PFAS
15/100
Bad
Overall
0/100
Bad
Good Books Good Cook Flexible Chopping Mats

Good Cook · Silicone Cutting & Prep Boards

Good Books Good Cook Flexible Chopping Mats

Bad

No coating details disclosed, look for brands with better transparency.

Verdict, SkipSilicone mats are generally safer than PVC alternatives; material ambiguity and silent PFAS stance warrant verification before purchase and mindful use.

Good Cook hasn't disclosed the coating or PFAS status of this mat, and flexible silicone or PVC may contain PFAS depending on manufacturing.

The safe swap

Ryobi Self-Healing Cutting Mat

Teflon

Ryobi Self-Healing Cutting Mat

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Flexible silicone or PVC chopping mat, coating unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Good Cook mats may contain PVC instead of or blended with silicone; PVC is commonly plasticized with phthalates, which can migrate to fatty or acidic foods. No material certification rules this out.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Any unspecified surface treatment or coating on the mat may degrade over time or with wear, potentially releasing particles into food contact surfaces. Silicone itself is stable, but additives or coatings are not disclosed.

70/ 100
⛏️

Leachable additives from base polymer

Flexible silicone and PVC formulations typically contain uncrosslinked oligomers and processing aids that can migrate in minor quantities, especially with acidic, fatty, or hot foods. No testing data is available for this specific product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Lack of food-contact certification

The product carries no published NSF, FDA food-contact clearance, or equivalent third-party verification. This is standard for budget kitchen mats but limits assurance of chemical safety standards.

45/ 100
⚠️

Material composition ambiguity

Retailers and product descriptions do not clearly specify whether the mat is silicone, PVC, or a blend, preventing informed hazard assessment at purchase. This opacity itself is a minor but real consumer safety transparency gap.

45/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Good Cook's flexible chopping mats are typically silicone or PVC based on product line variants, though the specific material composition is not clearly disclosed on most retailer listings. Silicone mats are inherently more chemically stable at room temperature and food-contact scenarios than PVC, which can leach plasticizers like phthalates under stress or with acidic foods. The coating or any surface treatments applied to these mats are unspecified, which prevents full assessment of potential leaching hazards. Flexible mats sold under this brand have no publicly available third-party certifications (e.g., FDA clearance statements, NSF approval) listed in accessible product documentation.

The brand's record and disclosure

Good Cook, a house brand primarily distributed through Kohl's and mass retailers, has no established public record of PFAS testing, disclosure, or formal commitment to avoid these chemicals in kitchen products. The brand has not published material safety data sheets or composition transparency statements for this product line. No significant recalls or safety controversies specific to Good Cook chopping mats appear in FDA or CPSC records, though this reflects limited scrutiny rather than proven safety. The parent company (Salton, Inc. successor entities) has not made category-wide chemical safety commitments comparable to premium cookware brands.

How it compares in its category

Silicone mats occupy a middle tier of chopping surface safety. They avoid heavy metal concerns present in some glazed ceramic or enameled wood alternatives, and they sidestep the heat-related coating breakdown risks of nonstick cookware with Teflon-type coating. However, they lack the transparency and third-party vetting of premium silicone products (e.g., those certified food-grade by NSF or with published material safety data). Budget-tier flexible mats from unbranded or less transparent manufacturers carry higher ambiguity around plasticizer content and potential contaminant migration than recognized silicone cookware brands.

If you buy it

Use the mat only for room-temperature or warm food prep; do not place hot cookware directly on it or expose it to temperatures above 350-400°F, as silicone and PVC can degrade and leach at elevated heat. Inspect the mat monthly for tears, discoloration, or odor changes; replace if any appear, as these signal polymer breakdown. Wash by hand with mild soap and cool water; avoid aggressive scrubbing and high-heat dishwasher cycles, which accelerate material fatigue. If material composition (silicone vs. PVC) remains unclear after purchase, contact the retailer or manufacturer directly to inform future buying decisions, especially if food allergies or chemical sensitivity are a household concern.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Good Cook has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Silicone Cutting & Prep Boards

Silikomart Silicone Grip Mat

Silikomart

Silicone Grip Mat

silicone rubber grip mat, non-coated

80/100
Excellent
Overall68Good
⛏️

Siloxane leaching (low-molecular-weight oligomers)

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microparticle shedding from grip surface

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mold or bacterial growth in surface texture

Limited concern

70

Low concern; silicone grip mats rarely contain PFAS.

Risky category by default

Rockler Silicone Project Mat

Pyrex

Rockler Silicone Project Mat

silicone

80/100
Excellent
Overall72Good
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth if unmaintained

Limited concern

70
🏭

Migration of manufacturing residue or plasticizers

Limited concern

70

Silicone project mat carries low concern; no coating risk.

Risky category by default

1, Size: 29cm/11.42 x 26cm/10.24 (Approx.)40cm/15.75 x 30cm/11.81 (Approx.)50cm/19.69 x 40cm/15.75 (Approx.)60cm/23.62 x

Pyrex

1, Size: 29cm/11.42 x 26cm/10.24 (Approx.)40cm/15.75 x 30cm/11.81 (Approx.)50cm/19.69 x 40cm/15.75 (Approx.)60cm/23.62 x

borosilicate glass

80/100
Excellent
Overall66Good
⚠️

Thermal shock fracture and cutting hazard

Moderate concern

45
🍳

Lid or handle coating hazards

Limited concern

70

Minimal concern. Pyrex borosilicate glass is inherently PFAS-free.

Risky category by default

More silicone cutting & prep boards grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.