PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Good Cook Parchment Paper Non-Stick 20 Square Feet

Good Cook · Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

Good Cook Parchment Paper Non-Stick 20 Square Feet

Bad

Avoid; parchment paper non-stick coatings often rely on PFAS; Good Cook makes no disclosure.

Verdict: SkipNon-stick coating chemistry undisclosed; PFAS risk moderate-to-high; acceptable if used below 420°F and replaced regularly, but safer alternatives exist.

Good Cook's parchment paper advertises non-stick performance but provides no information about coating chemistry or PFAS content. Parchment papers marketed as non-stick commonly use Teflon-family coating or silicone treatments that may contain legacy PFAS.

The safe swap

Home Collection Silicone Baking Mats

Farberware

Home Collection Silicone Baking Mats

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Paper with non-stick coating (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Non-stick coating degradation and fume release

Without public specification, the coating may contain fluorinated polymers (Teflon-type coating/PFA) or silicone. If fluorinated and heated above 400°F, thermal decomposition can release irritant gases. Temperature limits are not stated on packaging.

70/ 100
🍳

Coating leaching into food (migration)

Silicone and wax coatings can migrate into fatty foods (oils, butter, meat fats) at moderate heat. No migration study has been published for Good Cook's specific formulation; risk is typical for budget parchment but unquantified.

70/ 100
🏷️

Proprietary additives (undisclosed)

Manufacturers often use trade-secret release agents, stabilizers, or slip compounds in non-stick coatings. Good Cook provides no ingredient transparency, preventing independent hazard assessment of minor components.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Chlorine residue (if bleached)

Product packaging does not state whether paper is chlorine-bleached. Typical parchment is oxygen-bleached or unbleached; chlorine-bleached variants pose minimal but avoidable exposure risk. No recall or advisory exists for this brand.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Good Cook Parchment Paper is cellulose paper coated with a proprietary non-stick layer. The manufacturer does not publicly specify whether this coating uses fluorinated compounds (PFAS-based) or silicone alternatives. Most mass-market parchment papers rely on silicone or wax-based coatings, but some brands use Teflon-type coating or other fluorinated polymers, which can degrade and release fumes above 400-500°F. Without independent testing or brand certification, the exact coating chemistry remains opaque.

The brand's record and disclosure

Good Cook, owned by AMSCAN Holdings, is a budget cookware and kitchen accessory brand with no published PFAS policy, sustainability report, or third-party safety certifications on their parchment product. The brand has not voluntarily disclosed coating materials, testing protocols, or heat-stability limits. There are no documented recalls or safety complaints specific to this parchment line on public databases, but absence of complaint does not confirm safety.

How it compares in its category

Budget parchment papers (under $5 for 20 sq ft) typically offer lower disclosure and quality assurance than premium brands like If You Care (certified PFAS-free) or Regency Wraps (explicit silicone coating). Good Cook's price point and silence on coating type places it in the mid-risk segment. Unbleached or silicone-only parchment alternatives are available at similar cost from more transparent manufacturers.

If you buy it

Keep oven temperature at or below 420°F to minimize risk of coating breakdown or fume release; many parchment products lose stability above 450°F. Replace the paper between uses rather than reusing, as repeated heating degrades the non-stick layer and increases leaching potential. Do not use directly over open flame or in broilers. If you notice browning, discoloration, or odor during heating, discard the batch and switch to a certified alternative.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Good Cook has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Parchment Paper & Baking Liners

GreenPan Platinum Silicone Tongs

GreenPan

Platinum Silicone Tongs

silicone, stainless steel handle

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent

Silicone degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70
🎨

Color dyes or pigments in silicone

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial growth in grip seams or joints

Limited concern

70

Silicone tongs lower PFAS concern, but verify specific batch claims independently.

Risky category by default

Williams Sonoma Greenpan Premiere Collection Wide Tongs

GreenPan

Williams Sonoma Greenpan Premiere Collection Wide Tongs

stainless steel with silicone handle

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent

Silicone handle degradation

Limited concern

70

Stainless steel tongs with PFAS-free claim; lower concern for non-coated utensil.

Risky category by default

Tefal Ingenio K2060714 Steel Food Tongs

T-fal

Tefal Ingenio K2060714 Steel Food Tongs

stainless steel, bare uncoated

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
⛏️

Nickel leaching from stainless steel

Limited concern

70
🏭

Sharp edges or burrs from manufacturing

Limited concern

70

Bare stainless steel tongs carry no coating-related PFAS risk.

Risky category by default

More parchment paper & baking liners grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.