PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Listerine Cool Mint Floss

Listerine · Dental Floss

Listerine Cool Mint Floss

Excellent

Lower concern with no known PFAS risk factors, though no brand clarity exists.

Verdict: BuyStandard nylon floss with no established safety concerns; PFAS low-risk; minimal brand transparency gap for this product category.

Standard nylon floss requires no PFAS additives for its use. The brand makes no PFAS statements, but material itself poses minimal risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Nylon filament (standard dental floss)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens (menthol/mint flavoring)

Cool Mint formulation includes menthol and artificial flavor compounds; rare cases of oral irritation or contact dermatitis in users with mint sensitivity have been anecdotally reported, but incidence is very low and not formally documented in clinical literature for this product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Wax coating composition (paraffin or synthetic)

Standard food-grade paraffin wax used in dental floss is inert and non-toxic; no evidence of leaching or systemic absorption during oral use. Synthetic wax alternatives (polyethylene or polypropylene blends) are equally safe in this application.

95/ 100

Nylon filament degradation or microfiber shedding

High-quality nylon monofilament does not shed fibers during normal use; multifilament designs may occasionally shed individual strands if the floss is old or overused, but swallowing small amounts of nylon is not known to cause harm and is passed through the GI tract.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Dental floss does not use formaldehyde-releasing resins in its construction; this hazard is not relevant to this product class.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Cool Mint Floss uses approved food-contact colorants (typically FD&C approved dyes); no lead, cadmium, or other heavy metals are known to be present, and no testing has flagged this concern.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Listerine Cool Mint Floss is a conventional nylon monofilament or multifilament dental floss, the most common floss material globally. Nylon is a synthetic polymer that does not leach harmful chemicals into the oral cavity during normal use, as it is inert in the wet, low-temperature environment of the mouth. The floss is coated with wax (typically paraffin or synthetic wax) and flavoring agents to aid gliding between teeth; these additives are food-contact approved and are not absorbed systemically in meaningful amounts during brief daily use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Listerine (Johnson & Johnson subsidiary) has not published specific material safety data sheets or third-party certifications for this floss product. The brand does not explicitly address PFAS presence or absence in marketing or product documentation, which is common practice in the oral-care industry where regulatory scrutiny is lighter than in cookware or food packaging. No recalls, safety complaints, or independent testing red flags for this specific product are on public record.

How it compares in its category

Listerine Cool Mint Floss is functionally identical to most mass-market dental flosses (Oral-B, Reach, store brands); material safety profiles are essentially equivalent. Natural-fiber alternatives (silk floss) exist but carry no documented safety advantage and are more expensive. This product sits squarely in the middle of the market in terms of both efficacy and hazard profile.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from direct heat or sunlight to prevent wax softening. Replace the spool when floss becomes frayed or difficult to dispense, typically every 2-3 months with daily use. No special precautions are needed beyond normal use; the product is designed for daily contact with oral tissues and carries no heat-exposure risks. Discard used floss in regular waste; it is not recyclable.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Listerine has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Dental floss (plant-based or silk) and glass case

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if floss is stored damp

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Floss and glass are inherently PFAS-free materials.

Risky category by default

Waterpik Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Waterpik

Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Plastic housing, ABS/nylon components, stainless steel tip, silicone seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Silicone seal breakdown and leaching

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial biofilm in water reservoir

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Electronic component exposure if housing cracks

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern water flosser; no known PFAS-prone materials.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.