PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Mattress king size encasement/topper nectar rrp 69.99

Nectar · Mattress Protectors

Mattress king size encasement/topper nectar rrp 69.99

Poor

Avoid until the brand discloses waterproof treatment chemistry.

Verdict · SkipPolyurethane/polyester blend with undisclosed water-resistant coating and poor PFAS transparency; acceptable if stored cool and replaced every 3-5 years, but investigate coating type before purchase.

This polyurethane topper typically uses water-resistant surface coatings that the brand does not publicly detail. Waterproof treatments on bedding often contain PFAS or untested Teflon-family coating.

The better-graded swap

Sleepyhead 3 Gel-Infused Memory Foam Mattress Topper with Washable Cover

Sleepyhead

Sleepyhead 3 Gel-Infused Memory Foam Mattress Topper with Washable Cover

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyurethane/polyester blend with water-resistant coating (type unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from polyurethane

Polyurethane foam and films commonly release aldehydes and other VOCs when new, especially in warm conditions. Off-gassing duration and magnitude are not publicly tested for this specific product, but initial odor and respiratory sensitivity in sensitive individuals has been anecdotally reported for budget foam toppers.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding from polyester backing

Polyester fabric naturally sheds microfibers under friction and washing. This encasement's polyester layer may contribute microplastics to the sleep environment and washing water over time; frequency is not quantified for this product.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and leaching

Water-resistant coatings on textiles degrade with heat, humidity, and washing, potentially releasing monomers or breakdown products into the sleep microenvironment. The unspecified coating type makes it impossible to assess what compounds may leach as it deteriorates.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The water-resistant coating is unspecified, and Nectar has not disclosed treatment chemistry. Given the prevalence of PFAS-based water repellents in budget textiles and the brand's silence, PFAS presence is statistically likely but not confirmed for this specific batch.

Source, ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public testing or recall data suggests formaldehyde in Nectar toppers, but budget polyester textiles sometimes use formaldehyde-releasing resins for wrinkle resistance or durable water repellency. This product carries no third-party certification excluding formaldehyde, so the hazard cannot be ruled out.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This encasement combines polyurethane (a synthetic polymer foam or film layer) with polyester fabric and an unspecified water-resistant coating. Polyurethane can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) when new, particularly if the foam core is involved; the polyester is generally stable but may shed microfibers under friction. The coating's chemistry is the critical unknown, water resistance on textiles is often achieved with PFAS-based treatments (PFAS "forever chemicals"), which are linked to bioaccumulation and potential endocrine disruption, but sometimes with non-fluorinated alternatives. Nectar has not publicly disclosed which method they use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Nectar (owned by GreenBrands group) markets itself as a value mattress-in-a-box brand but has made no public commitments to PFAS-free treatments or third-party certifications (e.g., OEKO-TEX, GOTS) that would verify coating safety. Their silence on waterproof treatment chemistry is notable given widespread industry awareness of PFAS risks since the late 2010s. No major recalls or safety controversies specific to Nectar mattress protectors are on public record, but the lack of transparency is a red flag for informed consumers.

How it compares in its category

At $69.99 for a king-size topper, this is a budget-tier mattress protector. Competitors in the same price range often use similar polyurethane/polyester blends with opaque coatings; premium alternatives (e.g., Saatva, Helix) may disclose PFAS-free or certified treatments. Mid-range brands sometimes provide OEKO-TEX certification, which excludes PFAS and formaldehyde but does not guarantee their absence. Nectar's positioning and price point suggest cost-driven material choices, raising the likelihood of conventional fluorinated waterproofing.

If you buy it

Air out the encasement for 48-72 hours after unboxing to reduce initial VOC off-gassing. Keep it in a cool (below 75F), dry space to slow polyurethane degradation and avoid heat-accelerated breakdown of the coating. Wash with cool water and mild detergent only; avoid dry cleaning and high heat, which can degrade the waterproof layer and increase fiber shedding. Replace every 3-5 years as the coating naturally wears and its integrity becomes uncertain. Consider contacting Nectar directly to request their coating's ingredient disclosure before purchase if PFAS avoidance is a priority.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Nectar has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Mattress Protectors

Helix Premium Mattress Topper

Helix

Premium Mattress Topper

polyurethane foam, polyester cover

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) off-gassing from polyurethane foam

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyester cover degradation and microfiber shedding

Limited concern

70

Polyurethane foam degradation and chemical leaching with age

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Water-resistant coating composition (undisclosed)

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS risk, though contact Helix directly for water-resistant coating details they don't disclose.

Starting grade for this product type

Casper Sleep Comfy Mattress Topper

Casper

Sleep Comfy Mattress Topper

Polyurethane foam, cotton/polyester blend cover

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) off-gassing

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polyurethane foam degradation and particle shedding

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Dust mite and mold colonization

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern for standard foam topper with no known water-repellent coating or stain treatment, unless you need verified PFAS-free assurance.

Starting grade for this product type

Casper Sleep Essential Mattress Topper

Casper

Sleep Essential Mattress Topper

polyfoam/polyurethane foam topper

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade35Poor
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

High concern

20
🔥

Flame retardants

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Moisture and mold accumulation in use

Limited concern

70

Lower risk than coated fabrics, but contact Casper to confirm no finishing chemicals.

Starting grade for this product type

More mattress protectors grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.