PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall3/ 100Bad
OGIO 12L Lunch Box Flower Party - Flower Party

Oggi · Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

OGIO 12L Lunch Box Flower Party - Flower Party

Poor

Lunch box with unknown waterproof coating; brand provides no PFAS details.

Verdict: SkipPolyester lunch box with unknown waterproof coating and poor PFAS transparency; acceptable for cold food only if kept away from heat and regularly inspected.

OGIO does not disclose PFAS or coating chemistry for this insulated lunch box. Food-contact insulation and waterproof treatments often contain PFAS; lack of transparency is a caution flag.

The safe swap

Klean Kanteen Meal 34oz Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Klean Kanteen Meal 34oz Food Box

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester lining with waterproof treatment, outer fabric unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof coating composition (unknown fluorochemicals or polymers)

The waterproof treatment is not publicly identified by OGIO. If fluorine-based, it may contain PFAS (separately graded as Poor). Polyurethane or silicone alternatives carry lower known hazards but are unconfirmed here.

70/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in 'Flower Party' print or fabric

The decorative print on this model could use azo dyes, which can release carcinogenic aromatic amines under high heat or if the dye is low-quality. Risk is low under normal cold-food use but increases if product is exposed to heat or if dye quality is unverified.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microparticle release

Lunch boxes with waterproof linings commonly shed microscopic coating particles when worn, scratched, or washed repeatedly. Polyester linings are prone to this; long-term ingestion risk is low but unquantified.

45/ 100
💨

Off-gassing or odor from new product

New polyester products with applied coatings often emit odors (from residual solvents or coating volatiles). This dissipates within days to weeks but indicates chemical residue. Allow to air in a well-ventilated space before first food use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Polyester antimony (trace catalyst residue)

Polyester fabric may retain trace antimony from manufacturing catalysts, but migration to cold food is minimal and no specific recalls for OGIO polyester lunch items exist.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This lunch box features a polyester fabric lining with an unspecified waterproof treatment applied to achieve water resistance. The outer fabric material is also not disclosed by the brand. Polyester itself is stable under normal use, but the waterproof coating is the critical unknown: such treatments often rely on fluorochemicals (PFAS), silicone-based polymers, or polyurethane, each with different safety profiles. Without material transparency from OGIO, you cannot determine what chemical is protecting against moisture.

The brand's record and disclosure

OGIO provides no public documentation of materials, chemical treatments, or PFAS policies on this product or across its line. The brand has no established third-party certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) visible in public records for food-contact or consumer product safety. This silence is notable in an industry where major competitors increasingly disclose waterproofing chemistry. No recalls or safety controversies specific to this model are on record.

How it compares in its category

Most major lunch box brands (Rubbermaid, Sistema, Bentgo) now specify their coating types and many avoid PFAS-based water treatments. OGIO's refusal to disclose places it in a lower transparency tier. For the price point, competitors often offer comparable insulation with clearer material labeling. This product is not unique in design or performance to justify accepting chemical ambiguity.

If you buy it

Use only for cold foods and drinks; do not fill with hot liquids or microwave contents in the box itself, as heat can accelerate migration of coating chemicals into food. Inspect the lining regularly for peeling, cracks, or discoloration, which indicate coating degradation. Hand-wash only with cool water and mild soap; avoid dishwashers and prolonged soaking. Replace after 2-3 years or if the waterproof layer visibly fails, as continued exposure to worn lining chemicals may increase transfer risk.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Oggi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

Klean Kanteen Lunch Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Lunch Food Box

stainless steel with bamboo fiber lid

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Bamboo fiber lid degradation or contaminant absorption

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Gasket or seal material composition

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel construction with strong brand commitment to PFAS avoidance.

MADE SAFE certifiedBPA-free

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Klean Kanteen Meal 34oz Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Meal 34oz Food Box

stainless steel container with glass or ceramic lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Ceramic or glass lid degradation

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Gasket or seal leachables

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel food box lacks known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Klean Kanteen Rise Food Meal Box

Klean Kanteen

Rise Food Meal Box

Stainless steel container, food-grade silicone lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent

Silicone elastomer degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel and silicone are inherently PFAS-resistant materials.

Risky category by default

More lunch boxes & food containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.