PFAS80/ 100Excellent
Overall72/ 100Good
Esquirla Lunch Box Stainless Steel Leakproof Rectangle Portable Food Container Reusable Stackable Meal Prep Container wi

Sistema · Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

Esquirla Lunch Box Stainless Steel Leakproof Rectangle Portable Food Container Reusable Stackable Meal Prep Container wi

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; bare stainless steel container with no coating.

Verdict: BuyStainless steel container with silicone gaskets poses minimal chemical leaching risk; no established safety controversies for Sistema in this product line.

Stainless steel lunch box with silicone seals, inherently PFAS-resistant material. No nonstick or waterproof treatments typical of PFAS use. Brand offers no PFAS disclosure.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

stainless steel and silicone gaskets

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100

Silicone gasket degradation

Repeated dishwasher cycles and exposure to strong detergents or oils may cause silicone gaskets to crack, swell, or absorb odors after 1-2 years of heavy use. Monitor for loss of seal integrity.

70/ 100
⚠️

Stainless steel pitting/corrosion

Prolonged contact with chlorine (bleach), salt, or acidic foods can cause microscopic pitting in stainless steel over months to years. This is cosmetic rather than toxic but may compromise the seal area.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Uncoated safe material

Bare, uncoated material (cast iron, stainless, carbon steel, or glass) with no surface treatment to contain PFAS.

100/ 100

Microplastic from lid or latch components

If the product includes plastic latches or handles (not specified in full listing), these could shed microplastics with wear. Stainless container body itself poses no microplastic risk.

95/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

No public information indicates this model uses BPA-containing latches, and stainless-silicone designs typically avoid them. If present, any plastic latch would be a minor contact point (not food-contact).

Source: FDA
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Food-grade stainless steel (18/8 or higher) does not leach chromium, nickel, or iron at levels of concern under normal storage. No recalls or testing alerts exist for Sistema stainless containers.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This lunch box uses food-grade stainless steel (typically 18/8 or 18/10 chromium-nickel alloy) as the primary container, which is inert and does not leach metals under normal use conditions. The seal relies on silicone gaskets rather than plastic components like BPA-containing polycarbonate or polypropylene. Stainless steel avoids the microplastic shedding risk present in some plastic containers, and silicone gaskets are resistant to degradation from typical food storage and moderate heating.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sistema is a New Zealand-based kitchenware manufacturer with no major documented recalls or safety controversies specific to stainless steel food containers. The brand does not publicly disclose PFAS testing or supply-chain transparency policies, which is standard silence for cookware/storage manufacturers rather than a red flag. No independent testing has flagged Sistema stainless products for heavy metal leaching or coating hazards.

How it compares in its category

Stainless steel lunch boxes rank among the safer food storage options compared to polycarbonate or acrylic plastic alternatives, which carry BPA/BPS or phthalate risks. Glass containers offer equal or slightly better inertness but break more easily and are heavier. Silicone gaskets are chemically stable compared to plastic lid latches, reducing long-term wear hazards in repeated wash-and-heat cycles typical of meal-prep use.

If you buy it

Hand wash or use a warm cycle; stainless steel tolerates dishwashing but silicone gaskets degrade faster with repeated high heat. Inspect gaskets every 6-12 months for cracks, discoloration, or odor, and replace if present. Avoid prolonged contact with acidic foods (vinegar, citrus) at room temperature, as stainless steel can pit slightly over years. The container is food-safe up to moderate heat (not intended for oven baking); do not microwave with the metal lid sealed.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sistema has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

Klean Kanteen Lunch Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Lunch Food Box

stainless steel with bamboo fiber lid

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Bamboo fiber lid degradation or contaminant absorption

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Gasket or seal material composition

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel construction with strong brand commitment to PFAS avoidance.

MADE SAFE certifiedBPA-free

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Klean Kanteen Meal 34oz Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Meal 34oz Food Box

stainless steel container with glass or ceramic lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Ceramic or glass lid degradation

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Gasket or seal leachables

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel food box lacks known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Klean Kanteen Rise Food Meal Box

Klean Kanteen

Rise Food Meal Box

Stainless steel container, food-grade silicone lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent

Silicone elastomer degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel and silicone are inherently PFAS-resistant materials.

Risky category by default

More lunch boxes & food containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.