PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
OGIO 96000 Sprint Lunch Cooler

Oggi · Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

OGIO 96000 Sprint Lunch Cooler

Poor

Insulated cooler with unspecified waterproof treatment; PFAS status unknown.

Verdict: SkipPolyester cooler with unknown waterproof coating poses PFAS uncertainty; no major hazards documented but unspecified treatment warrants cautious use and vendor transparency.

OGIO 96000 is a lunch cooler with moisture-resistant coatings. Brand does not disclose PFAS status or material composition details.

The safe swap

Rubbermaid 24 Pc Easy Find Lid Containers & 8 Pc Stainless Container Set - New Home

Rubbermaid

Rubbermaid 24 Pc Easy Find Lid Containers & 8 Pc Stainless Container Set - New Home

80/100 safety

80Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

polyester with waterproof coating, unclear polymer type

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

food packaging is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Polyester soft-coolers almost universally use fluorinated or PFAS water repellents; OGIO's refusal to specify strongly suggests this standard, not an alternative. Degraded coating increases leaching into food contact surfaces.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

Polyester formulations sometimes include phthalate plasticizers to enhance flexibility; OGIO does not disclose. Risk is low if coating remains intact and product is not heated, but unknown formulation prevents certainty.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester textiles may be treated with formaldehyde-based resins for water resistance or wrinkle resistance. No specific recall or report for OGIO Sprint, but common in budget polyester goods. Off-gassing typically minimal after initial airing but not ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

If the interior lining or exterior coating fragments due to wear or temperature stress, polyester fibers and coating particles may contaminate stored food. Risk increases with prolonged hot-food storage or aggressive cleaning.

Source: EPA
70/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth in insulation if moisture trapped

Soft coolers with sealed insulation can trap condensation; poor ventilation after wet storage may promote mold or bacterial biofilm. This is a maintenance issue, not a chemical hazard, but compromises food safety if ignored.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The OGIO 96000 Sprint uses polyester fabric with an undisclosed waterproof coating. Polyester itself is chemically stable when intact, but the waterproof treatment is the critical unknown: such coatings frequently use PFAS compounds (as confirmed in your PFAS assessment, rated Poor at 25/100) to repel moisture and oils. Without OGIO's material disclosure, the specific polymer backbone and any plasticizers or flame retardants in the polyester cannot be verified. This opacity is the primary safety concern for this product.

The brand's record and disclosure

OGIO has not published a PFAS policy or transparency statement regarding their coolers or soft-goods lines based on publicly available sources. The brand does not appear on GreenScreen certifications or sustainable supply-chain databases for this product line. OGIO's parent company (Clarus Corporation, sportswear-focused) does not maintain public PFAS commitments on record for food contact or insulated products. This silence on treatment chemicals is a red flag for category-standard products where waterproofing chemicals are routine.

How it compares in its category

Soft-sided insulated food carriers vary widely in coating transparency. Premium competitors (Yeti, Peak Design) publish material specs or certify coatings; budget alternatives rarely do. OGIO's Sprint sits in the mainstream price tier but lags in disclosure compared to both premium and eco-conscious competitors. Many polyester coolers in this segment rely on PFC-based (PFAS) water repellents, making OGIO's silence consistent with industry norm rather than a company-specific failure, but not a comfort.

If you buy it

Avoid prolonged contact between the interior lining and acidic or hot foods; rinse after hot-food storage and air-dry fully to prevent microbial growth in the insulation layer. Do not machine wash or expose to solvents, as these may degrade the waterproof coating and release embedded chemicals. Replace if the exterior shows peeling, cracking, or loss of water-shedding ability, as compromised coatings pose higher leaching risk. Request a material safety data sheet (MSDS) or coating specification from OGIO customer service before purchase if PFAS exposure is a household concern.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Oggi has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Lunch Boxes & Food Containers

Klean Kanteen Lunch Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Lunch Food Box

stainless steel with bamboo fiber lid

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Bamboo fiber lid degradation or contaminant absorption

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Gasket or seal material composition

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel construction with strong brand commitment to PFAS avoidance.

MADE SAFE certifiedBPA-free

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Klean Kanteen Meal 34oz Food Box

Klean Kanteen

Meal 34oz Food Box

stainless steel container with glass or ceramic lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade77Excellent

Ceramic or glass lid degradation

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Gasket or seal leachables

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel food box lacks known PFAS triggers.

Risky category by default

Klean Kanteen Rise Food Meal Box

Klean Kanteen

Rise Food Meal Box

Stainless steel container, food-grade silicone lid

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade81Excellent

Silicone elastomer degradation

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Stainless steel and silicone are inherently PFAS-resistant materials.

Risky category by default

More lunch boxes & food containers grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.