PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall46/ 100Poor
OnCore Golf Balls

OnCore · Golf Balls & Equipment

OnCore Golf Balls

Good

No public PFAS data; golf ball cover materials often use Teflon-family coating.

Verdict · SkipOnCore golf balls pose minimal established safety hazards beyond unconfirmed PFAS in cover; urethane/rubber composition is inert during normal play.

OnCore provides no public PFAS disclosure. Golf ball covers commonly contain durable coatings that may include fluorochemicals for water and scuff resistance, and no independent testing exists.

The better-graded swap

Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

Dunlop

Dunlop Ddh I.c.e. Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Urethane/rubber core, dimpled synthetic cover

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball covers often use Teflon-family coating for water resistance and durability, but PFAS content is not disclosed by OnCore or competitors. No leaching occurs during normal play; hazard is occupational (manufacturing) or environmental (landfill/incineration), not consumer use.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Microplastic shedding

Synthetic urethane/rubber covers are dense and durable; they do not shed microplastics under normal play impact. Cover degradation produces visible flaking, not fine particulates that would be inhaled or ingested.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No public data or recalls exist for cadmium, lead, or other toxic metals in OnCore ball coatings. Cosmetic dyes in golf ball covers are not ingested and face no safety standard for this non-food product.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Urethane and rubber balls may emit trace VOCs when new, but exposure is negligible during outdoor play and dissipates quickly. No respiratory or neurological hazard is established for golf balls stored or used in normal conditions.

95/ 100

Allergic reaction to material components

Urethane and rubber are low-allergen materials. No cases of contact dermatitis or latex-type reactions from OnCore balls appear in public records. Risk is comparable to synthetic sports equipment (synthetic rubber grips, polymer apparel).

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

OnCore balls use a urethane or synthetic rubber cover over a rubber/urethane core, a standard composition across most modern golf balls. These materials are chemically stable during normal use (room temperature, outdoor exposure, impact). Unlike cookware or food-contact plastics, golf balls do not leach into consumables and are not heated or microwaved. The dimple pattern is pressed into the cover and does not involve coatings that degrade or shed microplastics under typical play conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

OnCore (owned by Callaway Golf) does not publish detailed material safety data sheets or PFAS content statements for consumer golf balls. The brand has no major product recalls or safety controversies on record. Industry-wide, golf ball manufacturers rarely disclose Teflon-family coating use in covers, though it is common for water-repellent durability. OnCore offers no third-party certifications for material composition or toxicity screening.

How it compares in its category

OnCore balls are mid-range to premium performance products comparable to Titleist Pro V1, Callaway Chrome Soft, and Bridgestone Tour B in construction and material class. All major brands use similar urethane or synthetic elastomer covers; none disclose PFAS status. Golf balls as a category carry minimal consumer safety risk compared to daily-contact products like cookware or textiles. Durability and cover degradation (observable wear, scuffing) occur over hundreds of shots, not from chemical leaching.

If you buy it

Store balls at room temperature away from direct sunlight; UV exposure degrades synthetic covers over time but does not create a safety issue. Discard balls when cover becomes visibly scuffed, cracked, or loses water repellency (typically after 50-100 rounds depending on play intensity). Do not incinerate used balls; standard landfill or recycling programs are appropriate. Wash with mild soap and water if desired; no special handling is required.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
OnCore has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.