PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
17-1/2" x 11-3/4" Non-Stick Cookie Sheet

Oneida · Bakeware

17-1/2" x 11-3/4" Non-Stick Cookie Sheet

Bad

Do not buy until the brand discloses coating composition.

Verdict: SkipNon-stick coating chemistry undisclosed by Oneida; assume Teflon-type coating-based until confirmed. Use cautiously below 500F, hand-wash, replace if coating degrades.

Oneida does not disclose the nonstick coating composition or PFAS status of this cookie sheet. Most nonstick cookware contains Teflon-family coating, making risk assessment impossible without brand details.

The safe swap

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

GreenPan

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Non-stick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (if Teflon-type coating-based)

Oneida has not disclosed coating type. If Teflon-type coating, overheating above 500-600F can release perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) precursors and hydrogen fluoride gas. Risk is low under normal baking (typically 350-425F) but present if broiler is used or oven malfunctions.

70/ 100

Coating degradation and ingestion

Non-stick coatings degrade over time with use and age. Flaking coating fragments could be ingested. No specific data on Oneida's coating durability, but this is a known failure mode for budget non-stick products.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The primary concern is lack of transparency. Without coating composition disclosure, consumers cannot assess total PFAS burden or compare to alternatives. This is a disclosure/accountability hazard, not a measured chemical hazard.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum leaching

Aluminum substrates are generally safe under normal baking conditions. Leaching risk is minimal unless the non-stick coating is compromised or the pan contacts acidic foods (e.g., tomato sauce) for extended periods. No reports specific to Oneida sheet pans.

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Modern US-manufactured non-stick coatings are not known to contain intentional lead or cadmium. Oneida products are subject to FDA food-contact regulations. No recalls or warnings on record for this product line.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This cookie sheet carries a non-stick coating of unspecified type. Industry standard for this price tier is typically Teflon-type coating (polytetrafluoroethylene, DuPont's Teflon or generic equivalent), which can off-gas toxic fumes if overheated above 500-600F. Oneida has not publicly disclosed whether this uses Teflon-type coating, ceramic, silicone, or a proprietary blend. The substrate is almost certainly aluminum, which is generally food-safe but can leach slightly in acidic conditions.

The brand's record and disclosure

Oneida is a long-established kitchenware manufacturer with no known major safety recalls on non-stick bakeware in recent years. However, the company does not publicly provide coating composition details or PFAS test results on product pages or literature. No third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, NSF) are advertised for this item. This silence on PFAS and coating chemistry is typical for mid-market cookware brands and represents a transparency gap, not necessarily a confirmed hazard.

How it compares in its category

Standard aluminum non-stick sheet pans dominate consumer bakeware. Oneida's approach is conventional but less transparent than competitors like OXO or GreenPan, which disclose Teflon-type coating absence or ceramic coating type. Cast iron, stainless steel, and parchment-lined alternatives eliminate non-stick chemistry risk entirely but require different handling. For convenience, this product sits in the middle of the safety-trade-off spectrum.

If you buy it

Hand-wash only; do not use high heat or broiler settings. Keep oven temperature below 500F to avoid fume release. Replace the sheet if the coating chips, flakes, or shows visible wear. Avoid metal utensils and abrasive scrubbers. Store flat or hang to prevent warping. Monitor for any unusual odor during first few uses, which could indicate coating breakdown.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Oneida has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Bakeware

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

Caraway

Ceramic Baking Sheet

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Coating degradation and metal substrate exposure

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum substrate leaching (if aluminum core)

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal shock and coating fracturing

Limited concern

70

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

GreenPan

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

Ceramic nonstick coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🔩

Coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microcracking and ceramic particle shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower risk, ceramic nonstick avoids Teflon-type coating and PFOA.

MADE SAFE (product-specific)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

4-Piece Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade76Excellent

Enamel degradation and iron leaching

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal stress fracture of enamel

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.

Risky category by default

More bakeware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.