PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall8/ 100Bad
Phnix Women’s Ski Jacket Size 10

· Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Phnix Women’s Ski Jacket Size 10

Bad

Skip until the brand discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or certifies PFAS-free.

Verdict · SkipPolyester ski jacket with undisclosed water-repellent coating poses PFAS concern; other textile hazards low-risk if cared for properly.

This ski jacket almost certainly uses a water-repellent coating finish typical of winter apparel, but the brand provides no public disclosure of the chemistry or PFAS content. Without third-party verification or a brand commitment to PFAS-free treatments, the waterproofing raises concern.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester/nylon with water-repellent coating (type unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Phnix Women’s Ski Jacket Size 10 is made of, ingredients and materials

This jacket is polyester/nylon blended shell with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the exterior. water-repellent coating coatings historically relied on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS) for water resistance, though some newer formulations use non-fluorine alternatives. The polyester base itself is a stable synthetic polymer with low migration risk under normal wear, but the coating chemistry is the primary concern here.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

The brand does not disclose water-repellent coating chemistry. Standard polyester ski jackets often use legacy PFAS fluorocarbons. Leaching risk during wear and wash is low but real; microfiber shedding during care may carry coating particles. No recall or complaint data specific to ski jackets, but category-wide concern is established.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester blends sometimes use formaldehyde-based resin to improve wrinkle resistance or durability. Product specifications do not mention this. Residual formaldehyde is typical of economy-tier outerwear but less common in mid-market ski lines. Off-gassing risk is minimal after initial wash-airing but not zero.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
💨

VOC off-gassing from coating and finishes

New water-repellent coating and polyester finishes release volatile organic compounds during first week of storage and early wear, causing odor. The brand does not specify cure time or ventilation needs. Airing the jacket outdoors for 24-48 hours before first wear substantially reduces this.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes in polyester colorant

Polyester garments are routinely tested for restricted azo dyes that release carcinogens under specific conditions. No specific red-flag dye issues documented for apparel. Standard industry compliance suggests low likelihood, but brand does not publish dye safety data.

95/ 100
✅

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is used as a catalyst in polyester production and can remain as a trace residue. Skin contact transfer is negligible in normal wear. No the brand-specific data; industry-standard testing shows minimal leaching into sweat simulant on untreated polyester.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The brand does not publicly disclose the specific water-repellent coating chemistry used in this jacket or provide PFAS-free certification. The brand's website and product documentation offer no transparency on fluorine-based treatments or alternatives. This silence is notable in a category where competitors like Arc'teryx, The North Face, and Salomon have begun publicly committing to PFAS reduction or using fluorine-free water-repellent coating systems.

How it compares in its category

Ski jackets universally require water repellency, making water-repellent coating coatings industry standard. Many major outdoor brands still use PFAS-based water-repellent coating but increasingly label it or offer certified alternatives. The brand's lack of disclosure places this product in the middle-to-lower transparency tier; you cannot make an informed PFAS choice without knowing the water-repellent coating type. Budget-tier and mid-market jackets often skip disclosure entirely, while premium lines increasingly offer fluorine-free options.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water with mild detergent and avoid fabric softeners, which can degrade water-repellent coating performance. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may strip or degrade the coating. Reapply water-repellent coating every 1-2 years after wash-wear; commercial water-repellent coating sprays and washing treatments are available (choose fluorine-free if possible). Hang-dry only; machine drying risks coating degradation and potential off-gassing of coating residues.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 42% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Phnix Women’s Ski Jacket Size 10?

  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.