PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall34/ 100Poor
Pinnacle Rush Golf Balls

Pinnacle · Golf Balls & Equipment

Pinnacle Rush Golf Balls

Good

Golf ball coating composition undisclosed. Skip if PFAS concerned.

Verdict · SkipIonomer cover and undisclosed core coating present possible VOC/off-gassing and unknown chemical exposure; PFAS composition opaque; acceptable for casual use with awareness.

Pinnacle provides no public disclosure of cover or coating PFAS content. The golf ball industry commonly uses synthetic rubbers and ionomers with potential water-repellent treatments. No third-party verification exists.

The better-graded swap

Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

Cabretta Leather Golf Glove

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Ionomer/synthetic rubber cover, unknown core coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
💨

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing from ionomer cover

Ionomer resin covers can emit VOCs during manufacturing and storage, particularly in warm conditions. Exposure risk is minimal during normal play but may increase if balls are stored in heat or left in vehicles for prolonged periods.

70/ 100
🏷️

Undisclosed core coating chemicals (unknown composition)

Pinnacle does not publicly reveal the chemical composition or additives in the golf ball core coating. This prevents independent assessment of potential hazards such as heavy metals, solvents, or processing residues.

70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and particle shedding over time

Ionomer covers can crack, peel, or degrade with use and weathering, potentially releasing microparticles or exposing underlying materials. Frequency and hazard level depend on play intensity and storage conditions.

70/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball coatings are a known vector for PFAS use (water and soil repellency); Pinnacle provides no public statement on PFAS presence or avoidance, leaving this hazard unresolved for this product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No test data or recalls indicate heavy metal contamination in Pinnacle Rush balls. However, the lack of manufacturer disclosure means this hazard cannot be ruled out for certain.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Pinnacle Rush uses an ionomer resin cover (a plastic polymer blend) over a synthetic rubber or polymer core; the core coating composition is not publicly disclosed by Pinnacle. Ionomer covers are standard in mid-tier golf balls and are chosen for durability and cost, but they can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs) during manufacturing and storage, especially in warm conditions. The undisclosed core coating is the primary concern, as manufacturers typically withhold this information for competitive reasons, making independent hazard assessment impossible.

The brand's record and disclosure

Pinnacle (owned by Acushnet Holdings) does not publicly disclose material safety data, certifications (such as Cradle to Cradle or Green Standard), or testing for chemical residues on its golf ball product line. The brand maintains silence on PFAS use in coatings, which is standard across the golf ball industry but leaves consumers without assurance. No major safety recalls or health complaints specific to Pinnacle Rush golf balls are on record, but the absence of transparency limits confidence in chemical safety claims.

How it compares in its category

Pinnacle Rush sits in the mainstream mid-market golf ball segment; nearly all competing balls (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade) use similar ionomer or urethane covers with proprietary, undisclosed core formulations. The golf ball category as a whole suffers from opacity in chemical composition due to trade secrecy and lack of regulatory pressure in most jurisdictions. Premium balls with urethane covers may off-gas slightly less than ionomer, but no manufacturer routinely releases VOC test data for their products.

If you buy it

Store balls in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight and heat to minimize off-gassing of VOCs from the cover; avoid leaving them in hot cars or bags for extended periods. Golf balls are not ingested and have minimal skin contact during normal play, so ingestion and dermal hazards are negligible unless materials degrade from damage or extreme heat. Replace balls when the cover becomes visibly cracked, peeling, or discolored, as degradation may increase particle shedding. Wash hands after handling if you have sensitive skin, though allergic reactions to intact ionomer covers are rare.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Pinnacle has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.