Plackers Micro Line Dental Floss Picks
Lower concern, but brand discloses nothing about PFAS.
Plackers floss picks use standard nylon floss and plastic handles with no known Teflon-family coating coatings. Brand makes no PFAS claims; no third-party testing found publicly available.
We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade
Material
nylon floss, plastic pick handle
Lab data
No public lab test
What Plackers Micro Line Dental Floss Picks is made of, ingredients and materials
Plackers Micro Line picks use nylon monofilament floss wound around a plastic (likely polystyrene or polypropylene) pick handle. Nylon does not leach plasticizers like phthalates or BPA during normal mouth use because it is not heated and remains in the oral cavity for seconds. The plastic handle is non-ingested and not subject to the heating or grinding that would accelerate leaching. This material pairing is not a material linked to PFAS in established dental product standards.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Microplastics
Mechanical wear on nylon floss can generate microscopic fibers; swallowing is unlikely given immediate removal, but repeated use may shed particles into the mouth. Extent of ingestion via this route is considered negligible by regulatory bodies.
Source, EPA ↗Plastic handle durability and splinter risk
Drop impact or aggressive use may crack the plastic handle, creating sharp edges or small fragments. Risk is low if picks are used gently and stored away from pressure.
What’s reassuring
Base material not linked to PFAS
The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.
Phthalates
Nylon floss and polypropylene/polystyrene handles do not typically contain phthalate plasticizers, and oral contact for seconds does not create conditions for leaching even if trace amounts were present.
Source, ATSDR ↗BPA & bisphenols
Polypropylene and polystyrene handles are not formulated with bisphenols as a standard practice. No reports link Plackers picks to BPA exposure.
Source, FDA ↗Formaldehyde / VOCs
Nylon and polypropylene are not treated with formaldehyde-releasing resins in commercial floss picks. No odor or off-gassing complaints are on record for this product.
Source, ATSDR ↗The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Plackers (owned by Prestige Consumer Healthcare) does not publicly disclose PFAS testing, material sourcing audits, or third-party certifications for this product line. The brand has no known safety recalls or controversies specific to Micro Line picks. Absence of disclosure does not indicate a problem, but reflects a general industry norm for oral care picks, which receive minimal regulatory scrutiny compared to cookware or food storage.
How it compares in its category
Dental floss picks occupy a low-hazard niche within oral care. Plackers Micro Line is a commodity product with no known differentiation in safety versus competitors like Oral-B or GUM picks. All major brands use similar nylon-and-plastic designs. The main variable is floss tension, durability, and handle ergonomics, not chemical safety. No credible data suggests nylon floss picks pose elevated risk relative to string floss or water flossers.
If you buy it
Store picks in a dry place; moisture alone does not degrade nylon or polypropylene significantly. Do not expose to sustained heat (dishwasher or direct sunlight in storage) as this could theoretically accelerate any minor leaching, though risk is negligible. Replace picks if the floss frays or loses tension. Discard if the handle cracks or splinters. Normal use poses no ingestion risk since picks are removed immediately after flossing.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Plackers has made a specific claim
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Dental Floss
Oral-B
ORAL B Glide Pro-Health Floss
- nylon monofilament
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microplastics
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
DentaFloss
Cocofloss Dental Floss
- Coconut fiber-based floss
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Microbial growth in natural fiber storage
DentaFloss
Oral-B Essential Floss
- Nylon floss, waxed coating
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Starting grade for this product type
More dental floss grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.