PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall59/ 100Good
Prose

Prose · Shampoo

Prose

Excellent

Lower PFAS concern; no known water-repellent coating/coating risks, but brand stays silent on chemical transparency.

Verdict: BuyProse shampoo carries no established safety red flags; lower PFAS concern and standard cosmetic hazards manageable with normal use.

Prose's liquid and powder formulations follow mainstream cosmetic standards with no confirmed PFAS-containing coatings, surfactants, or treatments. The brand doesn't disclose ingredient sourcing or PFAS avoidance.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Cosmetic formulations (hair/skin care liquids and powders)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
🏷️

Fragrance allergens and undisclosed fragrance components

Prose allows fragrance customization but does not itemize fragrance constituents in marketing materials. Synthetic or essential oil fragrances can trigger contact dermatitis or respiratory sensitivity in susceptible users; the personalized formula approach does not reduce this baseline cosmetic risk.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

While Prose has moved away from parabens, many liquid shampoos still rely on preservatives like methylisothiazolinone or formaldehyde-releasing agents (e.g., imidazolidinyl urea) to prevent mold and bacterial growth. The brand's silence on preservative choice means users cannot pre-screen for known allergens.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
⚠️

1,4-dioxane contamination in ethoxylated surfactants

Liquid shampoos often use ethoxylated surfactants (e.g., sodium lauryl ether sulfate alternatives) that can harbor 1,4-dioxane as a manufacturing byproduct. Prose does not publish testing data or specifications for 1,4-dioxane limits, leaving exposure uncertain.

70/ 100
⚠️

Scalp irritation from high pH or over-active ingredients

Personalized formulations may include potent actives (e.g., salicylic acid, zinc pyrithione) at concentrations optimized for the user's stated hair concern. Miscalibration during customization or user skin sensitivity can cause temporary irritation; Prose provides patch-test guidance but does not guarantee all formulas are hypoallergenic.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No recalls or testing data on record for Prose shampoos involving lead, cadmium, or arsenic. Botanical ingredients can accumulate trace metals from soil, but established cosmetic regulation and supplier vetting typically keep levels below concern thresholds in reputable brands.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Prose shampoos are personalized liquid formulations combining surfactants, conditioning agents, and botanical or synthetic actives tailored to individual hair types. As water-based cosmetics, they rely on preservative systems to prevent microbial growth and emulsifiers to blend oil and water phases. The brand emphasizes clean labeling and has publicly moved away from sulfates and parabens in most formulations, reducing exposure to older-generation preservatives tied to endocrine concerns.

The brand's record and disclosure

Prose publishes ingredient lists and allows customization input, suggesting ingredient transparency as a marketing stance. The brand does not hold third-party certifications (e.g., EWG Verified, Leaping Bunny) and maintains silence on PFAS testing or elimination commitments, which is common in the premium personalized cosmetics space. No recalls or substantiated safety controversies are on public record for Prose shampoos.

How it compares in its category

Prose positions itself as cleaner than mass-market drugstore shampoos, which often retain sulfates and synthetic fragrance blends with higher allergen loads. It sits mid-tier in transparency compared to certified natural brands (e.g., Acure, Burt's Bees) but ahead of conventional brands that withhold ingredient ratios. Personalization is a differentiator, not a safety advantage; formulation risk depends on the specific actives chosen.

If you buy it

Use as directed on the scalp; rinse thoroughly to avoid residue buildup. Prose formulations are not heat-sensitive in the way solid products are, so storage at room temperature away from direct sunlight is sufficient. If scalp irritation or allergic reaction develops after a few uses, discontinue and patch-test the formula on a small area first. Customized batches have typical shelf lives of 12-18 months; discard if separation, odor change, or visible growth occurs.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Prose has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Shampoo

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

Credo Beauty

Roz Salt Scalp Scrub

salt crystals, mineral-based scrub

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade86Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed fragrance components

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Mechanical irritation from crystal size and shape

Moderate concern

45

Low risk, salt scrub formulation carries minimal PFAS concern.

Credo Beauty certification

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

Puracy

Public Goods Shampoo Refill

aqueous surfactant-based liquid shampoo

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (surfactant byproduct)

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Fragrance allergens (undisclosed components)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial or mold growth in refill container

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a MADE SAFE certified shampoo avoiding fluorinated ingredients.

MADE SAFE

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Puracy Natural Shampoo

Puracy

Natural Shampoo

aqueous surfactants, plant-derived cleansers

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade78Excellent
⚠️

1,4-dioxane (contaminant in ethoxylated surfactants)

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70

Lower concern for a liquid shampoo with minimal PFAS risk in this category.

Risky category by default

More shampoo grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.