PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Radius Floss

Radius · Dental Floss

Radius Floss

Excellent

Lower-concern option, but brand discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict: BuyPlant-based vegan floss avoids Teflon-type coating and typical synthetic concerns; no documented safety incidents; transparent material choice supports low-risk profile.

Plant-based materials sidestep typical Teflon-type coating coatings in dental floss, but the brand offers no PFAS testing or certification. Material choice suggests lower risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Vegan plant-based wax or natural fibers (brand uses non-Teflon-type coating formulations)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Natural fiber allergenicity

Plant-derived fibers and waxes (e.g., candelilla, carnauba) may trigger contact allergies in individuals with sensitities to botanical compounds; documented cases are rare but users with known plant allergies should patch-test or consult a dentist first.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100

Wax coating degradation and ingestion

Plant-derived waxes are metabolically inert and non-toxic in small quantities if swallowed during flossing; no documented incidents of poisoning or gastrointestinal distress from Radius Floss or similar plant-wax formulations.

95/ 100

Microbial contamination during storage

Natural wax coatings are not antimicrobial and may support mold or bacterial growth if stored in humid conditions; however, the brief contact time during use and dry home storage make clinical risk negligible.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Plant waxes can bioaccumulate soil contaminants; Radius does not publish heavy metal testing data, but no recalls or contamination warnings have been issued for Radius Floss products.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Fragrance or essential oil additives

Some variants may include mint or other flavorings; Radius discloses these on packaging and no allergen complaints are on record, though individuals with fragrance sensitivity should verify the specific variant composition.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Radius Floss uses plant-derived wax coatings and natural fibers (often candelilla wax or similar vegetable waxes) rather than synthetic Teflon-type coating or polyethylene. This formulation eliminates the risk of Teflon-family coating fume exposure during manufacturing and disposal, and avoids petroleum-based plastisol coatings. The vegan positioning means no animal-derived glycerin or shellac, reducing potential allergen load for sensitive users. Natural wax coatings are biodegradable and pose minimal systemic toxicity if ingested in small amounts during flossing.

The brand's record and disclosure

Radius is known for transparency in material sourcing and publishes ingredient lists on packaging; the brand emphasizes sustainability and non-toxic formulations across its oral care line. No recalls, safety complaints, or documented product liability issues appear in public health databases or consumer safety records for Radius Floss. The brand does not make explicit PFAS-free claims in published materials, though the absence of Teflon-type coating and synthetic coatings makes PFAS presence unlikely. Third-party certifications (e.g., vegan, non-GMO status) are available but formal safety testing results are not publicly disclosed.

How it compares in its category

Most conventional floss uses polyethylene or Teflon-type coating (Teflon-coated), which carry minimal ingestion risk but raise manufacturing/disposal concerns. Silk floss is a traditional alternative but not vegan and may carry sericide concerns. Radius's plant-wax formulation sits in a small premium segment alongside brands like Unwaxed Dental Floss and other eco-conscious alternatives; it avoids synthetic polymer hazards while maintaining similar functional performance (gliding, shredding resistance). No independent comparative safety data exists between plant-wax and conventional floss formulations.

If you buy it

Use it as you would any standard floss: gently between teeth and below the gumline, using a fresh section for each gap. Store in a cool, dry place to prevent wax degradation; the plant-wax coating may soften in extreme heat but poses no safety risk. Replace the spool every 3-6 months or when the wax coating appears worn or discolored. If gums bleed or sensitivity develops, consult a dentist; this is not a product-specific concern but a general oral health indicator.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Radius has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Dental floss (plant-based or silk) and glass case

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if floss is stored damp

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Floss and glass are inherently PFAS-free materials.

Risky category by default

Waterpik Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Waterpik

Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Plastic housing, ABS/nylon components, stainless steel tip, silicone seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Silicone seal breakdown and leaching

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial biofilm in water reservoir

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Electronic component exposure if housing cracks

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern water flosser; no known PFAS-prone materials.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.