PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Fil Dentaire Sensodyne x1

Sensodyne · Dental Floss

Fil Dentaire Sensodyne x1

Excellent

Minimal PFAS risk likely, but manufacturer silent on composition.

Verdict: BuyDental floss carries minimal toxicological risk; Sensodyne's synthetic formulation avoids known hazards; minimal disclosure gap acceptable for this low-contact category.

Dental floss is typically nylon or polyester without intentional Teflon-family coating coatings. Sensodyne does not disclose PFAS status. Standard dental floss poses lower concern than waterproof or non-stick products.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

Dental floss, synthetic polymer (unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Flavoring/mint oil allergens

If this formulation contains added flavoring, mint or spearmint oil can trigger contact sensitivity in rare cases. Sensodyne does not list flavorings on visible product information; if present, the risk remains low given the tiny exposure volume and brief contact time.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100

Coating additives (slip agents, resins)

Sensodyne does not disclose specific coating chemistry. Common floss coatings (carnauba wax, polyethylene glycol, silicone) are low-toxicity; no adverse events linked to dental floss coatings are documented in regulatory databases.

95/ 100

Synthetic polymer degradation or shedding

Nylon and Teflon-type coating flosses do not degrade under normal oral use conditions. Microfiber fragments swallowed incidentally during flossing are cleared rapidly and do not bioaccumulate; no toxicological evidence of harm from floss fibers.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No evidence suggests Sensodyne floss uses formaldehyde-releasing antimicrobial resins. Such chemistry is rare in floss products; dental floss does not require antimicrobial preservatives in the formulation itself due to brief storage and use.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
🧠

Lead

Uncolored or white flosses typically contain no added pigments; if Sensodyne floss includes mint-green or blue dyes, heavy metal risk exists only if dyes are sourced from unregulated suppliers. No recalls or testing failures are on record for this brand.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Sensodyne dental floss is a synthetic polymer strand, likely nylon or polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon-type coating) based on category norms, with a wax or resin coating for slip and texture. Dental floss has negligible systemic absorption risk because contact is brief, localized to oral tissue, and the product is not ingested. The synthetic polymer backbone avoids natural material contaminants like pesticide residues in silk-based alternatives. Coating composition is the primary chemical exposure point, though quantities are trivial.

The brand's record and disclosure

Sensodyne (GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare) has a mixed transparency record: the brand discloses active ingredients in toothpastes but does not publicly detail floss material composition or manufacturing standards on product labeling or websites. No recalls or regulatory actions specific to Sensodyne floss are on record. The brand has not sought third-party cosmetic certifications (e.g., EWG Verified) for this product line, though such certification is uncommon for floss.

How it compares in its category

Dental floss is a low-risk cosmetic category overall; synthetic polymer flosses (nylon, Teflon-type coating) are chemically simpler than silk alternatives, which may carry hidden pesticide residues. Most branded flosses use identical or near-identical polymer chemistry. Sensodyne's positioning does not differentiate on material safety; it competes on ease of use and mint flavoring rather than purity claims. Unscented, unflavored generics carry identical risk profiles.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place away from heat and moisture to prevent coating separation (though this does not create a health hazard, only loss of slip). Replace the spool every 3-6 months or when fraying visibly occurs, as worn floss is less effective at plaque removal and may shred. Do not swallow large amounts of floss; small incidental swallows during normal use pose negligible risk. Discard if the spool is visibly damaged or moldy.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Sensodyne has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Dental floss (plant-based or silk) and glass case

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if floss is stored damp

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Floss and glass are inherently PFAS-free materials.

Risky category by default

Waterpik Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Waterpik

Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Plastic housing, ABS/nylon components, stainless steel tip, silicone seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Silicone seal breakdown and leaching

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial biofilm in water reservoir

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Electronic component exposure if housing cracks

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern water flosser; no known PFAS-prone materials.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.