PFAS30/ 100Poor
Overall4/ 100Bad
Sof Step 200 Artificial Grass Turf Roll

· Artificial Turf

Sof Step 200 Artificial Grass Turf Roll

Poor

Wait for manufacturer to disclose waterproofing chemistry.

Verdict · SkipSynthetic turf backing chemistry undisclosed; water-repellent coating treatment likely contains PFAS; no major recalls on record, but buy only if manufacturer confirms fluorine-free water treatment.

This artificial grass likely has water-resistant backing but SIS Pitches won't explain what waterproofing agents they use. Coating specifics remain unknown.

The better-graded swap

RealGrass Classic 5 ft. x 10 ft. Artificial Grass //sq. ft.

Realgrass

RealGrass Classic 5 ft. x 10 ft. Artificial Grass //sq. ft.

75/100 safety

75Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyethylene backing with synthetic turf face, likely water-repellent coating-treated

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Conventional water-repellent coating finishes on polyethylene-backed artificial turf often contain fluorinated compounds. SIS Pitches has not disclosed whether Sof Step 200 uses PFAS or PFAS-free alternatives, making this a material unknown with moderate probability given standard industry practice at mid-market price points.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from turf fibers

Synthetic polyolefin turf fibers naturally shed microplastics during use, especially in high-traffic zones or with aggressive brushing. This is common to all artificial turf products and not specific to Sof Step 200, but notable for installations near water bodies or where stormwater runoff is a concern.

70/ 100

UV degradation and coating breakdown

Polyethylene backing and water-repellent coating coatings degrade under prolonged UV exposure and temperature cycling. After 5-10 years of outdoor use, loss of water repellency and backing brittleness are expected; accelerated breakdown increases fiber shedding and potential exposure to underlying coating residues.

20/ 100

What’s reassuring

Leaching from backing adhesive or laminate

No recalls or published contamination reports for this specific product. Polyethylene backing itself is chemically stable, but adhesives between backing and turf face are not detailed; any leaching risk would be minimal under normal outdoor weathering.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No published test results or recalls indicating lead, cadmium, or antimony in Sof Step 200 turf face. Reputable manufacturers have phased out heavy-metal dyes, but without third-party certification from SIS Pitches, this remains unverified for this product.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Sof Step 200 consists of a polyethylene (PE) backing layer bonded to synthetic turf fibers, typically polypropylene or polyethylene. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish is the critical unknown, conventional water-repellent coating coatings on artificial turf historically use fluorinated compounds (PFAS-class chemicals) to achieve water and stain resistance. The backing itself is stable PE, which does not leach under normal outdoor conditions, but the coating composition directly determines whether the product poses PFAS exposure risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

SIS Pitches is a UK-based sports pitch installer with no publicly available safety disclosures regarding PFAS content, heavy metals, or third-party certifications for their turf products. No major product recalls or contamination incidents are on record. The manufacturer has not communicated whether their water-repellent coating treatment uses PFAS-free alternatives or conventional fluorinated chemistry, which is a significant transparency gap for a product marketed for residential and commercial use.

How it compares in its category

Artificial turf products are increasingly available with certified PFAS-free backings and water repellents, though these command price premiums. Standard PE-backed turf (like Sof Step 200) sits in the middle of the market and typically uses cost-effective water-repellent coating treatments that may contain legacy PFAS. Premium brands now market fluorine-free options and provide third-party testing certificates; Sof Step 200 lacks this transparency advantage.

If you buy it

Contact SIS Pitches directly to request documentation of water-repellent coating chemistry and whether PFAS-free treatment was used. Installation on well-draining soil or gravel reduces water pooling and any potential leachate contact. Avoid using in areas with high foot traffic on children's play zones unless PFAS-free certification is confirmed. Regular brushing and rinse-cleaning with plain water maintains the turf without accelerating coating degradation; avoid harsh chemicals or pressure washers that may compromise the backing seal.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Artificial Turf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

AstroTurf

SeeGreen 5 ft. W X 7 ft. L Green Polypropylene Astroturf

Polypropylene (PP) astroturf

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade35Poor
💨

VOC off-gassing from polyurethane or latex adhesive

Limited concern

70
🫧

Polypropylene UV degradation and microplastic shedding

High concern

20
⚠️

Backing adhesive failure and fiber separation

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Infill contamination (if rubber granules used)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern; polypropylene rarely requires PFAS, but no brand disclosure on treatments.

Starting grade for this product type

LITA ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

LITA

ECO Ultra Thick Cut to Length

Synthetic turf fibers (polyethylene/polypropylene backing)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade53Good
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from fibers

Moderate concern

45
⛏️

Leaching from backing polymers or adhesives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Infill contamination (if sand or crumb used)

Limited concern

70

Wait for brand to disclose turf composition; synthetic turf historically may use PFAS.

Starting grade for this product type

Multi Sport Turf

Multi Sport Turf

synthetic turf (polyethylene/polypropylene fibers, infill material unspecified)

PFAS Grade75Excellent
Overall Grade49Poor
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
🏷️

Undisclosed infill composition and leachates

Moderate concern

45
🫧

Fiber degradation and microplastic generation

Limited concern

70
💨

Volatile organic compound off-gassing during installation

Limited concern

70

Insufficient brand disclosure.

Starting grade for this product type

More artificial turf grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.