PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall46/ 100Poor
Spalding SD Tour Golf Balls

Spalding · Golf Balls & Equipment

Spalding SD Tour Golf Balls

Good

Golf balls rarely use PFAS, but coating composition unclear.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls present minimal consumer safety risk; synthetic polymer covers are stable in normal use. No major brand or material concerns on record.

Spalding provides no public PFAS information for this product. Golf ball covers and coatings are not typically PFAS-treated, but opacity on materials limits confidence. No lab data exists.

The better-graded swap

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polymer cover, core composition unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
🫧

Synthetic polymer cover degradation and microplastic shedding

Prolonged scuffing or UV exposure may degrade ionomer surface, but ingestion risk is negligible since golf balls are not consumed. Micro-wear particles from play remain external and are not a documented toxicity concern in this use context.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No public records document lead, cadmium, or other heavy metal contamination in Spalding golf ball coatings. Standard synthetic covers do not require colorant pigments that historically carried heavy metal risk.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Volatile organic compound (VOC) off-gassing

Polymer-core golf balls may emit trace VOCs during manufacturing, but finished product off-gassing in normal use or storage is negligible and has not been documented as a consumer concern.

95/ 100

Coating adhesion and leachable plasticizers

Ionomer covers do not typically use phthalate plasticizers in modern formulations. No evidence of leaching into skin during play. Spalding products are not flagged in consumer safety databases for plasticizer release.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Spalding SD Tour balls use a synthetic polymer cover (typically Surlyn or similar ionomer resin) over a solid or multi-layer core. Ionomer covers are chemically stable, non-volatile at normal temperatures, and do not leach into skin during play. The core composition is proprietary but standard for performance balls. These materials are inert during typical golf use and pose no significant exposure risk to hands or mouth.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spalding (owned by Evenflo/Russell Athletic parent company) does not publish detailed material safety or PFAS disclosure statements for golf balls. No product recalls or safety controversies specific to this model are on record. The brand is mainstream sports equipment manufacturer with no documented history of chemical hazard violations in this category.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls as a product category carry minimal chemical exposure compared to items like cookware, cosmetics, or textiles. Synthetic polymer covers are standard across all major brands (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade). Spalding's offering is typical for the mid-market segment with no distinctive safety advantage or disadvantage relative to competitors.

If you buy it

Golf balls require no special handling for safety during normal play or storage. Keep dry to prevent water absorption into core (degrades performance but not safety). Replace when cover scuffs or cuts significantly to maintain flight integrity. No maintenance or cleaning protocols affect safety; standard water rinse is sufficient.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spalding has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.