PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Spyder Men's Monterosa Jacket

Spyder · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Spyder Men's Monterosa Jacket

Bad

Skip until Spyder confirms water-repellent coating treatment is PFAS-free

Verdict: SkipPFAS-laden water-repellent coating finish plus Spyder's silent stance on treatment chemistry make this a hazard pending disclosure. Non-PFAS alternatives exist.

Spyder does not disclose PFAS chemistry for this jacket's water-repellent coating. Most outdoor apparel water-repellent coating treatments historically contain PFAS; no independent testing or brand statement available to confirm otherwise here.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Standard commercial water-repellent coating processes on polyester jackets historically used long-chain PFAS. Spyder's lack of disclosure suggests legacy chemistry unless stated otherwise. water-repellent coating coatings can shed microparticles and leach when wet-cleaned.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is a common catalyst in polyester production. While it remains in the fiber structure and does not readily leach under normal wear, high heat (ironing, dryer) can accelerate surface migration. No specific testing for Spyder polyester is on record.

70/ 100
⚠️

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from finish

water-repellent coating and other durable finishes can off-gas slightly during initial wear, especially in a warm or humid environment. Odor typically fades within a few wears. No specific complaint database entries for Spyder jackets exist.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes (if colored)

Spyder apparel is not known for azo dye controversies or restrictions. Modern polyester dyes are typically disperse dyes; however, color fastness and off-gassing should be checked after first wash. No recalls or incidents specific to this brand are documented.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Formaldehyde-based resins are less common in water-repellent coating systems than in cotton garments, but some blended or treated outer shells may contain trace amounts. Spyder does not publish finish chemistry details.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Monterosa is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer shell. Polyester itself is stable and low-toxicity, but the water-repellent coating is the concern: historically, most commercial water-repellent coating treatments relied on long-chain PFAS (perfluorocarbons) to achieve water and stain resistance. Spyder has not publicly disclosed whether this jacket uses PFAS-free alternatives like short-chain PFAS, fluorine-free chemistry, or wax-based systems. Without that information, assume legacy chemistry.

The brand's record and disclosure

Spyder, a performance outerwear brand owned by Authentic Brands Group, has not published a formal PFAS commitment or chemical transparency policy in publicly available materials as of 2024. The company does not appear on lists of brands that have pledged to eliminate PFAS by a specific date. Absence of disclosure is not confirmation of PFAS use, but it reflects a lack of chemical leadership in this product category where competitors have begun marketing PFAS-free water-repellent coating.

How it compares in its category

Many mid-to-premium ski and outdoor jacket brands (Patagonia, The North Face, Arcteryx) now offer PFAS-free or fully disclosed water-repellent coating options, often labeled as such on product pages. Spyder's silence puts the Monterosa behind the transparency curve. For the same price point, consumers can find jackets with Bluesign certification or explicit PFAS-free water-repellent coating claims, reducing uncertainty.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water with mild detergent; avoid fabric softeners and heat drying, which can degrade the water-repellent coating prematurely and increase leachate risk. Do not tumble dry or iron. If the jacket loses water repellency after 2-3 years, replacement is preferable to re-treatment, since aftermarket water-repellent coating products may add additional chemical unknowns. Store in a cool, dry place to minimize off-gassing.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Spyder has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.