PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall6/ 100Bad

Stio · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Environ Jacket

Bad

Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating chemistry or provides testing.

Verdict · SkipUnspecified water-repellent coating chemistry combined with silent PFAS stance makes this jacket impossible to assess for fluorochemical load; nylon itself carries minor hazards if managed.

Stio does not disclose PFAS status or water-repellent coating treatment type for the Environ Jacket. Most outdoor jacket waterproofing uses PFAS; verification is needed before purchase.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating treatment (type unspecified)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Environ Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

The Environ Jacket is nylon with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment, but Stio has not disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry is used. Traditional water-repellent coating finishes have historically relied on PFAS compounds to achieve water and stain resistance; newer non-PFAS alternatives (wax-based, silicone, or fluorine-free systems) exist but require explicit confirmation. Nylon itself is a synthetic polymer with low migration risk under normal wear, but the water-repellent coating layer is where hazard concentration typically occurs.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Stio has not disclosed the specific water-repellent coating formulation. If legacy PFAS-based (perfluorooctanoic acid, perfluorooctane sulfonate), accumulation and persistence in the environment and body are documented. No test data is available for this product.

Source, ATSDR ↗
45/ 100
🫧

Nylon microfiber shedding during washing

All synthetic textiles shed microfibers in the wash. Nylon is a known contributor to microplastic pollution in waterways. Washing in a microfiber-retention bag or mesh reduces release but does not eliminate it.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Nylon apparel can use formaldehyde-based finishing agents, but Stio has not disclosed finish type for the Environ Jacket. No recalls or reports of problematic formaldehyde levels are on record for this model.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes (colorant hazard)

No evidence this jacket uses prohibited azo dyes, and Stio is not flagged for azo-dye violations. The standard risk applies only if dyes are non-compliant; unknown dye source is a general transparency gap, not a confirmed hazard.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Stio has not made a public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating or released third-party testing of this jacket's fluorochemical content. No major safety recalls or certifications (such as bluesign or GOTS) are on record for this model. The silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is a red flag in an era when responsible outdoor brands routinely disclose or eliminate PFAS in water-resistant apparel.

How it compares in its category

Outdoor nylon jackets with water-repellent coating are standard, but transparency varies widely. Competitors like Patagonia, Arc'teryx, and Rab now offer PFC-free (PFAS-free) water-repellent coating options and publish test results; Stio's lack of disclosure places it below industry leaders in this regard. The jacket itself is not unusual, but the opaqueness around its finish is a significant competitive disadvantage in consumer trust.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water with mild detergent; avoid fabric softeners and high heat, which can degrade the water-repellent coating layer. Line-dry to preserve water repellency. Expect water-repellent coating effectiveness to decline over 2-3 years of regular use; re-treatment products are available but should themselves be PFAS-free if sustainability is your concern. Consider contacting Stio directly to request water-repellent coating composition before purchase.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Stio has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Environ Jacket?

  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.