PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad

Stio · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Skillet Stretch Down Hooded Jacket

Bad

Skip until brand discloses water-repellent coating treatment details.

Verdict · SkipPFAS water-repellent finish undisclosed; brand silent on water-repellent coating chemistry. Other textile hazards unconfirmed but unmitigated by transparency.

Stio does not publicly disclose PFAS content or water-repellent coating treatment type in this jacket. Standard outdoor apparel water-repellent coatings commonly use PFAS; confirmation needed before purchase.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Stretch fabric with water-repellent finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Skillet Stretch Down Hooded Jacket is made of, ingredients and materials

Stio Skillet Stretch Down Hooded Jacket uses a synthetic stretch fabric (likely polyester blend) with a water-repellent finish applied to the outer surface. The 'down' filling refers to insulation, typically goose or duck down clusters. The water-repellent coating is the primary concern, most water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finishes on outdoor apparel historically rely on PFAS "forever chemicals" (PFAS), which persist in the environment and body. Without Stio's disclosure of the specific chemistry, the presence of legacy PFAS or newer alternatives cannot be ruled out.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

If fabric is polyester blend (likely, given stretch properties), antimony trioxide catalyst residue is possible but typically present at very low levels in finished garments. Stio does not specify polyester source or fiber processing, so migration risk during wear or washing is not quantified.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic fibers

Stretch polyester blends release microfibers during washing and wear, particularly if pilled or abraded. Down jackets are worn in high-motion zones, increasing fiber release over the garment's lifespan. No brand-specific mitigation (filter certification, microfiber-shedding studies) is documented.

20/ 100
⚠️

Down fill allergenic potential and sourcing opacity

Down insulation carries rare but documented allergenic reactions (histamine sensitivity, dust mite colonization). Stio does not disclose down source (geographic origin, animal welfare standard, cleaning protocol), making contaminant or allergen risk unverifiable.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based wrinkle or shrink resist finishes are documented on this product. Stio does not disclose finish chemistry, so presence cannot be confirmed or ruled out with certainty.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No specific azo dye or heavy metal contamination has been reported for Stio apparel. Industry-wide testing of synthetic outdoor fabrics shows low incidence, but independent lab verification for this model is not on public record.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Stio has not published detailed water-repellent coating treatment specifications or PFAS phase-out commitments available in public records. The brand has not signed the Outdoor Industry Association's Chemicals Management Working Group pledges or similar transparency initiatives. No major recalls or formal health warnings linked to Stio apparel have been documented, but silence on water-repellent coating chemistry is the core issue, competitor brands (Arc'teryx, Patagonia, The North Face) have disclosed PFAS-free or PFAS-reduced alternatives, making Stio's lack of transparency a relative gap.

How it compares in its category

Premium outdoor hooded jackets in this price range increasingly offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating options (wax blends, silicone-based, or fluorocarbon-free treatments). Stio's silence suggests continued reliance on traditional PFAS chemistry or insufficient consumer pressure to change. Budget alternatives may use weaker water repellency requiring more frequent re-treatment; high-end transparent brands (Rab, Fjallraven) publish chemistry data, setting a higher standard Stio does not yet meet.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water with minimal detergent to reduce water-repellent coating shedding and microfiber release into waterways. Avoid high heat in drying; air dry or low tumble to preserve down loft and coating integrity. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may degrade the water-repellent layer. If water beading diminishes after 1-2 seasons, consider PFAS-free re-treatment products (silicone-based sprays) rather than relying on brand replacement, given lack of coating disclosure.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Stio has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Skillet Stretch Down Hooded Jacket?

  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.