PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
Jacket The North Face Men's ThermoBall Eco Snow Triclimate

The North Face · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Jacket The North Face Men's ThermoBall Eco Snow Triclimate

Bad

Avoid unless The North Face confirms PFAS-free water-repellent coating or obtains third-party certification.

Verdict · Skipwater-repellent coating chemistry undisclosed; no textile hazards reported, but PFAS uncertainty and silent brand stance warrant caution and care instructions.

The brand withholds information about the water-repellent coating chemistry on this jacket. Modern water-repellent coating coatings often rely on fluorinated compounds, though some brands now offer PFAS-free options.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon with water-repellent coating finish; ThermoBall synthetic insulation

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Jacket The North Face Snow Triclimate is made of, ingredients and materials

The jacket uses nylon as the outer shell with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish and synthetic ThermoBall insulation (polyester-based). water-repellent coating coatings on nylon are commonly applied using fluorochemical compounds, and The North Face has not publicly disclosed whether this specific jacket uses traditional PFAS-based water-repellent coating or newer PFAS-free alternatives like wax or silicone blends. The nylon itself is stable and low-risk; the uncertainty centers entirely on the water-repellent coating chemistry.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon water-repellent coating coatings often use legacy or modern fluorochemicals; The North Face has not disclosed which formulation is used on this model. Skin contact risk is low but environmental persistence of legacy PFAS in manufacturing and disposal is a known concern.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation and microfiber shedding

Over time, water-repellent coating coatings can crack or peel, especially with frequent washing or heat exposure. Shedding of nylon microfibers during wear and laundering is minimal but cumulative with other synthetic garments; care practices limit this risk.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No formaldehyde-based resin finishes are typical for nylon technical apparel at this quality level. Nylon and polyester insulation do not normally require formaldehyde-releasing treatments for this jacket type.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
✅

Azo dyes and colorfast stability

The North Face maintains standard textile dye safety; no azo dye restrictions are flagged for this brand's apparel. Colorfast performance on nylon is reliable under normal laundering.

95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

ThermoBall polyester insulation does not require added flame retardants for apparel use. Synthetic insulation in ski jackets is not treated with halogenated or bromine-based flame retardants.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face does not maintain a public commitment to PFAS-free water-repellent coating across its apparel lines and has not disclosed the chemistry of water-repellent coating finishes for this model. The company has faced environmental scrutiny over fluorochemical use in outdoor gear but has not published a timeline for transition. Without direct confirmation from the brand, the water-repellent coating formulation remains unknown.

How it compares in its category

Most ski jackets at this price point and performance tier use water-repellent coating-treated nylon; alternatives using non-fluorinated water-repellent coating (such as those Patagonia has committed to) are available but less common in technical snow gear. The ThermoBall insulation is a mid-tier synthetic choice and does not present hazards beyond typical polyester-based insulants. The Triclimate system (removable liner) is standard for the category and adds no specific safety concerns.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently and use plain water or mild detergent to minimize water-repellent coating reapplication need. Do not dry-clean, as solvents may alter the finish. Avoid heat drying; air dry completely. If water-repellent coating degrades visibly (water no longer beads), contact The North Face to confirm the specific water-repellent coating chemistry before applying aftermarket water-repellent coating treatments, which may contain additional fluorochemicals. Store in a cool, dry place away from heat sources.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Jacket The North Face Men's ThermoBall Eco Snow Triclimate?

  • Wool blend with synthetic fill (likely polyester)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating composition

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • wool blend (natural fiber dominant)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment - undisclosed chemistry

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Merino wool blend (natural fiber)
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and synthetic dye residue

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.