PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Summit Series Mountain Gore-Tex Pro Jacket

The North Face · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

The North Face Men's Summit Series Mountain Gore-Tex Pro Jacket

Bad

High-end waterproof jacket; PFAS status unclear, no disclosure from brand.

Verdict: SkipHigh-performance jacket with undisclosed PFAS in water-repellent coating finish; no other established textile hazards on record. Requires transparency demand before purchase.

Gore-Tex Pro membranes and water-repellent coating finishes often contain PFAS, but The North Face does not publicly disclose their specific chemistry. No third-party testing data available for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex Pro shell with water-repellent coating treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex Pro jackets typically use PFAS-based water-repellent coating finishes unless explicitly stated otherwise. The North Face has not disclosed the chemistry for this model, making fluorinated PFAS presence highly probable based on industry standard practice.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester fiber

Polyester shells may contain antimony trioxide as a catalyst residue from fiber production. Levels are typically trace and migration into skin contact is low, but antimony presence in the fiber itself is not formally ruled out by the brand.

70/ 100
🍂

Laminate delamination and microparticle shedding

Extended wear, heat exposure, or aggressive washing can cause Gore-Tex laminate to separate from the outer fabric. While not a chemical hazard, microfiber shedding from the degrading shell is a secondary risk after years of use.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of formaldehyde-based resins in Gore-Tex laminate or The North Face polyester shells. Modern synthetic waterproof fabrics generally avoid formaldehyde, though finish processes should be verified.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

The North Face has phased out lead and cadmium in dyes across most product lines. No specific safety alerts for this Summit Series jacket color or dyeing process are on record.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Gore-Tex Pro is a laminated polyester shell with a microporous Teflon-type coating membrane bonded to fabric layers. The jacket relies on a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer surface to shed water without blocking breathability. Most commercial Gore-Tex jackets use fluorinated water-repellent coating coatings (PFAS-based), though some newer alternatives exist. The North Face has not publicly disclosed which water-repellent coating chemistry is used in this specific Summit Series model.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face has not signed the AFIRM (Apparel and Footwear International RSL Management) group commitment on PFAS elimination and remains silent on fluorinated finishing agents in their waterproof lines. The brand has been responsive to some chemical hazards (lead cadmium removal from dyes) but has not engaged transparently on PFAS timelines or product-level disclosure. No major recalls or formal safety violations specific to this jacket model are on public record.

How it compares in its category

Premium technical jackets in this price tier routinely use PFAS-based water-repellent coating; The North Face position is standard for the high-end segment, not exceptional. Some competitors (e.g., Patagonia) have begun labeling fluorine-free water-repellent coating options, while others maintain silence. This jacket lacks the transparency advantage of brands that explicitly state non-fluorinated finishes or phaseout timelines.

If you buy it

Wash separately in cool water with minimal detergent to extend water-repellent coating durability; avoid high-heat drying, which can degrade the laminate bond. Expect water-repellent coating reapplication every 1-2 years depending on use frequency; third-party fluorine-free water-repellent coating products exist as lower-risk alternatives for retreatment. Do not tumble dry or expose to sustained heat above 140F, as polyester melting point approaches 260F but the laminate can separate at lower temperatures. Request product-level PFAS disclosure from The North Face before purchase if PFAS exposure is a personal priority.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.