PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
The North Face Men's Summit Verbier GTX Jacket

The North Face · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

The North Face Men's Summit Verbier GTX Jacket

Bad

High PFAS risk likely, no brand transparency on water-repellent coating chemistry.

Verdict: SkipFunctional alpine jacket with high PFAS risk via water-repellent coating; non-PFAS hazards minimal. Use only if durability justifies replacement frequency.

Gore-Tex waterproof jackets typically use PFC-based water-repellent coating treatments, a common PFAS source. The North Face provides no public disclosure of their PFAS elimination or testing for this model.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex membrane with water-repellent coating

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex membrane itself is inert, but polyurethane/polyester outer layer receives fluorinated water-repellent coating finish. North Face silence on chemistry means C8 PFOA or C6 alternatives are both plausible; degradation during wear and washing mobilizes residues.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes in colored components

Verbier is available in multiple colors (black, red, yellow variants). Nylon shell and lining may use disperse or acid dyes; high-hazard azo dyes are restricted under EU REACH but not fully prohibited globally. No specific testing on record for this product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester lining/insulation

If insulation or lining contains polyester (common in North Face alpine jackets), antimony trioxide may be used as polymerization catalyst. Levels are typically below regulatory concern in normal wear, but no brand transparency on antimony content available.

70/ 100
💨

Membrane/adhesive off-gassing during first wear

Gore-Tex laminates use solvent-based or moisture-cured polyurethane adhesives. New jackets may emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for 24-48 hours; air-dry before extended wear to minimize inhalation. This is transient and not toxic at typical exposure levels.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No public record of formaldehyde finish in Gore-Tex laminates or nylon base. Gore-Tex manufacturing is heavily regulated for volatile emissions, and The North Face does not list formaldehyde-related complaints for this model.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Summit Verbier uses Gore-Tex 3-layer membrane bonded to outer nylon shell, with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coating applied to the face fabric. Gore-Tex itself is Teflon-type coating-based microporous film, which does not off-gas under normal wear. The critical hazard is the water-repellent coating finish: The North Face has not disclosed whether it uses legacy C8 PFOA, newer C6 variants, or non-fluorinated alternatives. This coating degrades with washing and UV exposure, requiring reapplication, which reintroduces water-repellent coating chemicals with each treatment.

The brand's record and disclosure

The North Face (VF Corporation subsidiary) has no published commitment to PFOA phase-out or transparent water-repellent coating chemistry disclosure for consumer products, despite widespread industry migration toward fluorine-free options. The brand uses Gore-Tex across its premium line without publicly specifying water-repellent coating chemistry. No major recalls or formal regulatory findings on this specific jacket model are on record. This silence is notable given competitor brands (e.g., Arc'teryx, Rab) now publicly specify PFOA-free or fluorine-free alternatives.

How it compares in its category

Premium alpine hardshells split into two groups: fluorinated-water-repellent coating (The North Face, Patagonia core line, many established brands) and emerging fluorine-free options (Fjallraven, some Arc'teryx models, specialty brands). The Verbier occupies the traditional, high-PFAS-risk segment. Competitor jackets with equivalent breathability and durability but fluorine-free water-repellent coating (e.g., Patagonia Triolet, Arc'teryx Beta) command similar or lower price points, making PFAS avoidance feasible in this category.

If you buy it

Minimize skin contact when wet (water-repellent coating is most bioavailable when saturated). Avoid machine washing or use minimal-detergent cold cycles; hot water accelerates water-repellent coating breakdown. Do not dry-clean or tumble-dry (heat degrades Gore-Tex backing). Plan for 4-7 years before recoating becomes necessary, at which point you reintroduce chemical load; evaluate fluorine-free recoating products (e.g., Granger's, Fibrapel) as alternative to factory service. Store dry to extend coating life.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
The North Face has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.