PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall42/ 100Poor
Top Flite Control XL Golf Balls

Top Flite · Golf Balls & Equipment

Top Flite Control XL Golf Balls

Good

Insufficient disclosure. Golf ball coatings often treated but unclear here.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls pose minimal ingestion/skin contact risk; synthetic polymer covers are stable in use. PFAS disclosure gap is noted but not a usage hazard for this application.

Top Flite does not publicly disclose PFAS in their golf ball formulations or coatings. Golf ball covers sometimes use fluorochemical treatments, but this product's composition is unverified.

The better-graded swap

Snell PR3 Golf Ball

Snell

Snell PR3 Golf Ball

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Synthetic polymer blend with proprietary cover formulation

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball cover formulations are trade secrets and Top Flite does not disclose PFAS use. Industry practice varies; some manufacturers use water-based treatments without added PFAS, others do not. No test data or manufacturer statement available for this product.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic release into environment

Lost or discarded golf balls may degrade slowly in soil or water and shed microplastics over years. This is an environmental concern, not a direct user safety hazard, and is common to all synthetic golf balls regardless of brand.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Polymer degradation and particle shedding

Synthetic polymer covers are durable and remain intact during normal use. Visible cover peeling or cracking occurs only after extended play or abuse, not in storage or casual handling; any shedding would be small plastic fragments, not chemical leachate.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Golf ball cover paints and finishes are cosmetic only and not ingested or absorbed through skin during play. No recalls or complaints of cadmium, lead, or azo dye toxicity in Top Flite or competitor products are on record.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing

Golf balls do not undergo heating during use and are stored at ambient temperature. No documented VOC release or off-gassing complaints in this product category exist in public databases.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Top Flite Control XL uses a synthetic polymer blend cover (likely ionomer resin or polyurethane) over a rubber/synthetic core, a standard construction for modern golf balls. The cover formulation is proprietary and not publicly detailed by the manufacturer. Unlike cookware or food-contact items, golf balls have no direct skin contact during normal use (gloved hands, brief touch) and zero ingestion pathway, so cover chemistry poses minimal acute exposure risk. The ball remains intact during play and does not degrade, leach, or off-gas into consumables.

The brand's record and disclosure

Top Flite (owned by Callaway Golf/Topgolf Callaway Brands) does not publicly disclose PFAS content or manufacturing chemical restrictions for its golf ball lines. The brand has no established transparency record for hazardous substance reporting in this category and no known third-party certifications (e.g., bluesign, GOTS) that would apply to a sports equipment item. No safety recalls or material contamination incidents are documented for this specific product line.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls are functionally inert consumer goods with no category-standard hazard benchmarks (unlike cookware or textiles). Competitors (Titleist, Bridgestone, Callaway) similarly do not disclose PFAS or chemical formulations for proprietary covers. All premium golf balls are closed, durable systems with no foreseeable leaching or particle shedding during normal use, making material transparency less pressing than for repeated-contact or food-adjacent products.

If you buy it

Store balls in a cool, dry place; extreme heat or UV exposure over years may cause minor cover degradation, though this affects performance far before any safety concern. Golf balls are not meant to be mouthed, chewed, or heated; normal golf play carries no chemical exposure. Replace when performance drops or visible damage (deep cuts, severe discoloration) occurs, typically after 1-3 seasons. No special cleaning is needed beyond a rinse; avoid harsh solvents that might degrade the cover.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Top Flite has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.