PFAS50/ 100Good
Overall32/ 100Poor
Vice Golf Pro Galaxy Golf Balls

Vice Golf · Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Golf Pro Galaxy Golf Balls

Good

No PFAS data available. Coating composition undisclosed.

Verdict · SkipGolf balls present minimal consumer safety risk; no known hazards in standard play. PFAS status unclear but not a contact-hazard route.

Vice Golf doesn't disclose PFAS or coating details for Pro Galaxy balls. Standard golf ball covers may contain Teflon-family coating without verification.

The better-graded swap

Nitro Glycerin Golf Balls 15-Pack

Nitro Golf

Nitro Glycerin Golf Balls 15-Pack

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Surlyn/polyurethane core with synthetic elastomer cover (typical golf ball construction)

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Unknown / proprietary coating

A coating is recorded with no disclosed chemistry.

75/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Golf ball covers may contain water-repellent PFAS compounds; Vice does not disclose coating chemistry. No testing data available for this specific product line.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Golf balls degrade and fragment over years of play, especially in water hazards. Shed microplastics from synthetic covers could enter waterways; this is an environmental route, not a direct consumer health route during use.

70/ 100
⚠️

Choking hazard (non-chemical)

Golf balls are a known choking hazard for children under 8, but this is a mechanical/design issue, not a chemical safety issue relevant to this analysis.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) off-gassing

Polyurethane and Surlyn covers may release trace VOCs during manufacture and initial storage, but outdoor use and ventilation make exposure negligible. No reports of odor or health complaints tied to Vice balls.

95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No evidence of lead, cadmium, or arsenic in golf ball dyes. This hazard class is not documented for any major golf ball brand and is unlikely given the polymer chemistry and manufacturing standards.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Vice Golf Pro Galaxy balls use a Surlyn or polyurethane cover over a synthetic elastomer core, standard construction for mid-range golf balls. These materials are durable polymers chosen for ball flight and wear resistance, not for skin contact or ingestion routes that trigger food-safety rules. The cover and core are not designed to leach into food, water, or skin under normal golfing use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Vice Golf is a direct-to-consumer brand without published third-party safety certifications or disclosed material testing for contaminants. The company does not publicly address PFAS, heavy metals, or volatile organic compounds in their ball construction. No recalls or safety incidents specific to Vice Golf balls are on record with the CPSC or other regulatory databases.

How it compares in its category

Golf balls from all major brands (Titleist, Callaway, TaylorMade, Vice) use similar cover polymers and are not regulated as consumer products requiring material safety disclosure, unlike cookware or children's toys. No category-wide testing or transparency standard exists for golf ball composition. Vice's pricing and online sales model are typical of the segment and do not change material risk profile.

If you buy it

Store in a cool, dry place; do not heat or cut open balls. Golf balls are not intended for children under 8 years old due to choking risk, but this is a design issue, not a chemical hazard. Normal play poses no dermal or inhalation exposure. Dispose in regular waste; do not incinerate.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Vice Golf has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.