PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Volcom Anyox Guide Gore Pro Shell Jacket Men's

Volcom · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Volcom Anyox Guide Gore Pro Shell Jacket Men's

Bad

Gore-Tex Pro likely contains PFAS; Volcom silent on composition and PFAS use.

Verdict: SkipGore-Tex Pro shell carries likely PFAS exposure; other textile hazards minimal but water-repellent coating finish durability unknown. Acceptable with informed use and care protocols.

Gore-Tex Pro shell jackets typically use PFAS-based waterproof membranes and water-repellent coating coatings. Volcom discloses no PFAS policy or testing data for this product.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Gore-Tex Pro shell with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Gore-Tex Pro shells rely on PFAS-containing water-repellent coating coatings per industry standard. Volcom discloses neither water-repellent coating chemistry nor PFAS phase-out, making exposure duration and concentration unknowable without independent testing.

Source: ATSDR
20/ 100

Coating degradation and leachables from laminate adhesives

Polyurethane adhesive bonding Gore-Tex to outer and lining fabrics can degrade over time, especially with heat or aggressive washing. Chemical leachates from degraded adhesive are not well-characterized in published literature for this specific product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No reported formaldehyde resin treatments, wrinkle-resistance, or dye-related incidents recorded for Volcom Gore-Tex shell jackets. Polyester base and technical dyeing are low-risk for formaldehyde contamination in this product class.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Volcom shells typically use acid or disperse dyes on polyester, which carry minimal azo dye or heavy metal risk if produced to standard apparel safety protocols. No specific concerns documented for this brand.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester fiber

Antimony trioxide is sometimes used as a catalyst in polyester production but is not a recognized hazard in finished apparel under normal wear conditions. No evidence of elevated antimony in Volcom jackets; standard industry controls apply.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

This jacket uses Gore-Tex Pro, a laminated polyester-polyurethane membrane bonded to outer and lining fabrics. The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish on the shell is the likely vector for PFAS compounds, which are applied to achieve water and stain resistance without breathability loss. Gore-Tex Pro's construction itself is Teflon-type coating-based but encapsulated; the primary exposure concern is the surface water-repellent coating treatment, which degrades with washing and wear, potentially releasing bound PFAS into sweat and contact water over the jacket's lifetime.

The brand's record and disclosure

Volcom has not published substantive PFAS reduction commitments, timelines, or material sourcing transparency on their technical apparel lines. The brand does not list Gore-Tex Pro jacket composition beyond generic fiber type, leaving water-repellent coating chemistry unspecified to consumers. This silence contrasts with competitors (e.g., Patagonia, Arc'teryx) who disclose PFAS phase-out efforts or use PFAS-free water-repellent coating alternatives. No major safety recalls or formaldehyde/azo dye incidents are on record for Volcom shell jackets.

How it compares in its category

Gore-Tex Pro remains the industry standard for waterproof-breathable technical shells, but carries inherent PFAS legacy. Alternatives like eVent or Polartec NeoShell use different chemistries with lower PFAS certainty, though no membrane is guaranteed PFAS-free without explicit third-party verification. Volcom's silent stance puts it below brands with published PFAS roadmaps. Price and performance metrics place it mid-range for shell jackets; durability is strong if care protocols are followed.

If you buy it

Wash infrequently in cool water with mild soap; avoid heavy detergents and fabric softeners, which accelerate water-repellent coating breakdown and may increase PFAS leaching. Never dry-clean or use hot water, as heat degrades the membrane bond and coating. Replace when water no longer beads on the outer shell (typically 3-5 years with normal use), signaling water-repellent coating failure and end-of-life for the garment. Ensure good ventilation during and after wear to minimize PFAS vapor inhalation from the jacket surface.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Volcom has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.