PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall2/ 100Bad
Volcom Arthur 3L Jacket Men's

Volcom · Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Volcom Arthur 3L Jacket Men's

Bad

Waterproof jacket with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry; PFAS risk unclear.

Verdict: SkipPolyester jacket with unknown water-repellent coating chemistry poses unclear PFAS risk; no major non-PFAS hazards documented, but opacity on waterproofing treatment warrants cautious purchase.

Volcom provides no public disclosure of PFAS status or water-repellent coating treatment specifics on this 3L jacket. Standard waterproof apparel often uses fluorinated coatings, but brand transparency is absent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with 3L waterproof membrane, water-repellent coating treatment unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

clothing is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
🎨

Azo dyes (color fastness toxins)

Polyester outer shells can be dyed with azo dyes, which may release carcinogenic amines under degradation or heavy sweat/sun exposure. No test data available for the Volcom Arthur specifically; risk is low but common across polyester outerwear.

70/ 100
🧴

Phthalates

The polyurethane or polyester membrane layer may contain phthalates to improve flexibility; these do not migrate into skin under normal wearing conditions but can off-gas slightly indoors if jacket is stored in warm spaces. No brand or product-specific reports.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic shedding from coating degradation

3L membranes and water-repellent coating coatings shed microplastics with repeated washing and abrasion over years. This is a known issue across the rain jacket category; durability and care practices (cool wash, less frequent laundering) reduce shedding rate.

45/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester and polyurethane membranes do not inherently require formaldehyde binders. No recalls or safety notices on record for this product or brand model related to formaldehyde off-gassing from 3L jackets.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

Antimony in polyester

Antimony trioxide is used as a polymerization catalyst in polyester production but is tightly bound in the polymer chain and does not leach at normal wearing temperatures. No documented health incidents from antimony in polyester apparel.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Volcom Arthur 3L uses polyester fabric with a 3-layer waterproof membrane, a standard construction for budget-to-mid-range rain jackets. The 3L structure typically consists of polyester outer shell, glued polyurethane or polyester membrane middle layer, and polyester lining. Polyester itself is stable and poses minimal chemical hazard at normal wearing temperatures, but the waterproofing treatment (water-repellent coating: water-repellent coating) applied to the outer shell is the variable; Volcom has not publicly disclosed whether this uses fluorinated PFAS compounds or newer alternatives.

The brand's record and disclosure

Volcom is a subsidiary of Authentic Brands Group and does not maintain a public position statement on PFAS use or elimination timelines. The brand has not earned third-party certifications such as Bluesign or Cradle to Cradle that would signal commitment to restricted chemistry. No major safety recalls or chemical controversies are on record for this specific model. Volcom's transparency regarding waterproofing treatments lags behind competitors like Patagonia and Arc'teryx, which explicitly declare PFAS-free or fluorine-free options.

How it compares in its category

The Volcom Arthur sits in the commodity rain jacket segment where water-repellent coating composition varies widely and is rarely disclosed to consumers. Competitors at similar price points (e.g., Columbia, The North Face entry lines) similarly omit water-repellent coating chemistry details, though some now offer PFAS-free variants clearly labeled as such. Premium brands (Patagonia, Arc'teryx, Mountain Hardwear) have begun phasing in disclosed fluorine-free or PFAS-free coatings, making them more transparent if costlier. This product does not stand out as higher or lower risk relative to its peers, but the lack of transparency is the norm rather than exception in this price tier.

If you buy it

Wash the jacket in cool water with mild detergent and avoid fabric softener or heat-drying, which can degrade the membrane and water-repellent coating finish. Do not iron or expose to direct high heat; air dry flat or on a hanger. Reapply water-repellent coating treatment (via commercial spray or wash-in products) every 1-2 seasons as durability fades with wear and laundering. If you have concerns about PFAS exposure, contact Volcom directly to request water-repellent coating composition data before purchasing, though response likelihood is low.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Volcom has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Ski & Snowboard Jackets

Patagonia Women's Untracked Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Untracked Jacket

recycled polyester with water-repellent coating treatment

PFAS Grade35Poor
Overall Grade17Bad
♾️

PFAS

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastics

Moderate concern

45

Coating degradation and leaching

Limited concern

70

Lightweight jacket with water-repellent coating finish.

Waterproof or stain-proof treatment

More ski & snowboard jackets grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.