PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall71/ 100Good
Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser

Waterpik · Dental Floss

Waterpik Ultra Water Flosser

Excellent

Lower concern; water-contact device without known PFAS-prone coatings.

Verdict: BuyWater flosser with plastic reservoir and motor; no established safety recalls or leaching concerns; low-risk cosmetic device with routine maintenance.

Waterpik Ultra is a motorized water flosser with plastic and metal parts. No public evidence of PFAS-containing coatings, waterproofing treatments, or brand disclosures regarding forever chemicals.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

plastic reservoir, electric motor, metal pump components

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

cosmetics is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial growth in stagnant reservoir water

Plastic reservoirs can harbor biofilm if not emptied and dried between uses, especially in humid environments. Risk is behavioral rather than material-based and is minimized by routine emptying and occasional rinse with dilute vinegar or baking soda solution.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from a material with no inherent PFAS use (ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber).

100/ 100
🍼

BPA & bisphenols

Room-temperature, intermittent water contact in a device held for seconds per use does not create the conditions for significant plastic leaching observed in heated cookware or long-term food storage. No recalls or testing data suggest this is a concern for Waterpik Ultra models.

Source: FDA
95/ 100

Metal corrosion or leaching (pump/valve components)

Stainless steel and brass components in contact with fresh tap water do not typically corrode or leach heavy metals under normal use. Risk increases only if salt water, hydrogen peroxide, or acidic solutions are routinely used, which is outside the intended operating environment.

95/ 100
🫧

Microplastics

Plastic wear from the reservoir or tubing can theoretically produce microplastics, but this would require visible material failure (cracks, fragmentation) and has not been reported as an issue for this product line. Replacement after 2-3 years of use prevents advanced wear.

Source: EPA
95/ 100

Electrical safety (motor, heating elements)

Waterpik Ultra is a low-voltage device (typically 100-240V AC adapter) with no heating element and standard safety certifications for consumer appliances. Immersion or prolonged water exposure during storage poses a minor electrical hazard but is not a material or chemical concern.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Waterpik Ultra uses a plastic (likely polycarbonate or ABS) reservoir to hold water, an electric motor to generate pressure pulses, and stainless steel or brass pump components that contact the water stream. Plastic-to-water contact in this product is intermittent and non-heated, which significantly reduces leaching risk compared to cookware or heated beverage containers. The brief residence time of water in the reservoir and room-temperature operation mean BPA or phthalate migration is minimal under normal use.

The brand's record and disclosure

Waterpik is a long-established oral care brand owned by Church & Dwight (maker of Arm & Hammer) with no major product recalls tied to chemical leaching or material failures in publicly available databases. The company has not issued dedicated materials or PFAS transparency statements, which is typical for consumer oral-care devices rather than cookware or food-contact manufacturers. No third-party testing or adverse events related to chemical contamination have been widely reported for this model.

How it compares in its category

Water flossers are lower-risk than food-storage containers or cookware because water exposure is brief, room-temperature, and not ingested directly through the device itself. Compared to other pressure irrigation systems (e.g., Sonicare AirFloss, Panasonic EW models), the Waterpik Ultra uses conventional plastic and motor design with no unusual material choices or known durability red flags. No competitor in this category has established a significant safety advantage based on available evidence.

If you buy it

Empty the reservoir after each use to prevent stagnant water and bacterial biofilm growth, especially in warmer climates or if unused for several days. Replace the device if you notice discoloration, cracks, or motor noise changes, as these may indicate internal wear; most models have a 2-3 year practical lifespan. Use only clean tap or distilled water; salt water or mouthwash additives may corrode internal metal components or damage seals. Check tubing connections periodically for leaks, which are usually a sign of wear rather than a manufacturing defect.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Waterpik has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Dental Floss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Floss & Ploss

Love of Earth Co. Floss + Glass Case

Dental floss (plant-based or silk) and glass case

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade82Excellent
🏷️

Fragrance allergens or undisclosed additives

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Microbial growth if floss is stored damp

Limited concern

70

Lower concern. Floss and glass are inherently PFAS-free materials.

Risky category by default

Waterpik Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Waterpik

Cordless 1000 Water Flosser

Plastic housing, ABS/nylon components, stainless steel tip, silicone seals

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade73Good

Silicone seal breakdown and leaching

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Bacterial biofilm in water reservoir

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Electronic component exposure if housing cracks

Limited concern

70

Lower-concern water flosser; no known PFAS-prone materials.

Risky category by default

More dental floss grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.