By PFAS Authority · Updated August 31, 2026

Top grades to buy

Super Hipster

Aisle

Super Hipster

100Excellent
APEC 2-in-1 Pull-Down Kitchen Faucet

APEC Water Systems

APEC 2-in-1 Pull-Down Kitchen Faucet

100Excellent
AQUASURE Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

Aquasure

Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System

100Excellent

Model-based grades, not lab tests. We flunk more than we pass. How grading works

Best PFAS-Free Products, A Buyer's Guide Based on Available Materials and Data

Based on available materials and public disclosure data, the highest grade in this guide goes to the Seventh Generation Tampons, at 100 with a published lab non-detect result on record. An earlier version of this guide cited a generic reverse osmosis listing at 100 on a lab result that does not exist, and we removed that listing on 17 September 2026. Until 17 September 2026 this guide named the Berkey Berkey Gravity Filter its strongest overall pick, but it grades 95 and Berkey is not certified for PFAS reduction. No single product is right for every household, so this guide compares top-graded options across water filters, bakeware, tampons, and period underwear, all scored using the same methodology rather than laboratory testing of every unit.

These grades reflect our model's reading of materials, brand statements, and published lab results where they exist, not independent lab verification of each individual product batch. A high grade means "lower concern" based on what is currently disclosed, never a guarantee that a product is entirely free of PFAS or that it is "safe" in an absolute sense. If you want to browse beyond this list, our product finder lets you filter by category and grade.

Summary Comparison

ProductCategoryPFAS Grade (Model Estimate)Verdict
Berkey Berkey Gravity FilterWater FiltersExcellent (95/100)Gravity filter; not certified for PFAS reduction
LifeStraw FilterWater FiltersExcellent (95/100)Portable; for travel or emergency use
Caraway Ceramic Baking SheetBakewareGood (70/100)Ceramic coating, brand statement
GreenPan GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick BakewareBakewareGood (70/100)Brand statement; graded as a named coating
Lola Organic TamponsTamponsGood (70/100)Organic cotton; Lola says nothing about PFAS in its tampons
Seventh Generation TamponsTamponsGood (70/100)Highest tampon grade here; lab non-detect on record
Lola High Waist Period UnderwearPeriod UnderwearGood (50/100)Water-resistant treatment offsets Lola's statement
Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period BriefPeriod UnderwearExcellent (90/100)Highest period underwear grade here; lab result on record
Brita Standard FilterWater FiltersExcellent (95/100)Budget pitcher; vague safety claims only

Water Filters, Where PFAS Removal Actually Matters Most

Water filtration is arguably the category where PFAS considerations matter most, since PFAS contamination in municipal and well water is well documented in public testing data. The Berkey Berkey Gravity Filter grades 95. It gets a material credit, less 15 points because Berkey says nothing about PFAS in the filter itself. Berkey is not certified for PFAS reduction, so treat any reduction claim as a brand statement and weigh it against your own water testing. Pros, stainless construction, no electricity needed, strong reputation among gravity-filter users. Cons, higher upfront cost, filter elements need periodic replacement, and no PFAS reduction certification.

We grade specific reverse osmosis units rather than reverse osmosis as a technology, and none is ranked in this guide. Reverse osmosis membranes are generally well regarded in the water treatment industry for reducing a broad spectrum of dissolved contaminants. The usual trade-offs are slower flow, water waste during filtration and periodic membrane replacement costs, and you still need to confirm NSF/ANSI 58 certification for PFOA and PFOS on the exact unit. Our under-sink reverse osmosis finder lists the under-sink systems we grade.

For portable use, the LifeStraw Filter grades 95, a material credit less 15 points because LifeStraw says nothing about PFAS in the product. Pros, lightweight, useful for travel or emergency preparedness. Cons, not designed for whole-home use, and the WQA PFOA and PFOS certification LifeStraw describes is for its Home pitchers, so check this filter's own listing before counting on PFAS reduction.

Budget pitcher filters also score well. The Brita Standard Filter ZeroWater Filter, and Kirkland Signature Filtered Water Pitcher all grade 95 and offer accessible entry points. None of the three makers says its filter is PFAS-free. ZeroWater says it holds IAPMO certification to NSF/ANSI 53 for PFOA and PFOS reduction, and we have not confirmed a PFAS reduction certification for the Brita or Kirkland. Pros, low cost, widely available, easy replacement cartridges. Cons, lower estimated contaminant-reduction capacity compared to reverse osmosis or gravity systems with larger carbon beds, and pitcher capacity limits daily output. Explore more options at /finder/water-filters.

Bakeware, Ceramic Coatings as an Alternative to Traditional Nonstick

Traditional nonstick cookware has historically relied on fluoropolymer coatings, which has driven interest in ceramic-coated alternatives. The Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet grades 70 (Good). Caraway says its ceramic coating is made without PTFE, PFOA and PFAS, a brand statement we have not verified, and we count the ceramic layer as a coating. It graded 90 until 17 September 2026, when a material credit on its record was corrected. Pros, attractive design, easy-release ceramic surface, brand transparency about materials. Cons, ceramic coatings may degrade faster than fluoropolymer coatings with abrasive utensils, and premium pricing.

The GreenPan GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware grades 70 (Good). GreenPan says its ceramic coating is made without PFAS, which we have not verified. We grade it as a named non-fluorinated coating, which adds 10 points, the same as the Caraway sheet. An earlier version of this guide graded it 100, and we corrected it on 17 September 2026. Pros, generally lower price point than Caraway, widely available at major retailers. Cons, ceramic coatings can lose nonstick performance over time, and, as with any coated bakeware, longevity depends on care and cooking temperature. See more bakeware options at /finder/bakeware and cookware broadly at /finder/cookware.

Tampons and Period Underwear, Materials Transparency Matters

Menstrual products sit close to sensitive body tissue, so ingredient and material transparency is a common consumer concern, though it's worth noting that association between PFAS exposure and specific health outcomes does not establish causation in any individual product's case. The Lola Organic Tampons and Lola Non-Toxic Applicator Free Tampons both grade 70 (Good). Lola says they are organic cotton, which earns a material credit, but Lola says nothing about PFAS in its tampons, which adds 15 points. An earlier version of this guide graded both 100 and named the organic tampons its top pick, and we corrected that on 17 September 2026. Pros, organic cotton material, ingredient disclosure. Cons, higher price per unit than mass-market brands, and "non-toxic" is a brand marketing term, not a regulatory or lab-certified designation.

The Seventh Generation Tampons grade 100 and are more widely available in mainstream retail. Seventh Generation itself says nothing about PFAS in them, but a published Mamavation lab test returned a non-detect result. Pros, broad distribution, established brand history in the "clean" consumer goods space. Cons, a single published test is not batch-level lab testing.

In period underwear, the Lola High Waist Period Underwear and Modibodi Basic Mid-Rise Period Brief grade 90 (Good) and 90 (Excellent). Lola says its underwear is made without PFAS, but we add 35 points for its water-resistant treatment, and an earlier version of this guide graded it 100, which we corrected on 17 September 2026. Modibodi says PFAS are not intentionally used and Mamavation testing detected no fluorine, which outweighs the same treatment penalty. This category has faced scrutiny in the past over waterproof or moisture-wicking layers sometimes relying on fluorinated treatments, so brand disclosure about the absorbent layer materials is particularly relevant here. Pros, reusable, reduces disposable product waste. Cons, absorbent layer materials vary by brand and style, and washing instructions must be followed to maintain performance. Browse the full category at /finder/period-underwear and tampon options at /finder/tampons.

What to Avoid

Based on available public reporting and industry patterns, categories that have historically carried higher PFAS concern include, stain-resistant upholstered furniture and carpets treated with fluorinated stain guards (see /finder/upholstered-furniture and /finder/carpets), waterproof rain jackets and boots using older durable water repellent (DWR) formulations (see /finder/rain-jackets and /finder/waterproof-boots), grease-resistant fast food and microwave popcorn packaging (see /finder/food-packaging and /finder/microwave-popcorn), and some waterproof mascaras and long-wear foundations (see /finder/waterproof-mascara and /finder/foundation-primer). Look for brands that publish specific material disclosures rather than vague "eco-friendly" language, and treat any unverified brand claim of being "PFAS-free" as a starting point for research rather than a final answer.

Our Pick

For drinking water, every filter in this guide grades 95, and a grade does not measure how much PFAS a filter removes, so compare their PFOA and PFOS reduction certifications instead. If you want a gravity filter with no plumbing or electricity, the Berkey Berkey Gravity Filter grades 95, but it is not certified for PFAS reduction. For bakeware, the Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet ties GreenPan's GreenLife bakeware at 70, and for menstrual care the Seventh Generation Tampons grade highest at 100 on a published lab non-detect, ahead of the Lola Organic Tampons at 70. None of these determinations replace your own research or, where health concerns are significant, consultation with a medical professional, since the connection between PFAS exposure and health outcomes remains an area of ongoing study and association does not equal causation.

Every grade on this page is a model-based estimate built from materials, brand statements and published lab results, not a laboratory test of our own, and nothing here is being called PFAS-free or safe by us. You can look up any specific product in our PFAS product finder.

Now check your own stuff

Search anything you own and get its PFAS grade in seconds.

Check a product →

Get the graded list, free.

The products we score each week, and the best-graded alternative in every category.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.