PFAS25/ 100Poor
Overall0/ 100Bad
Always Daily Protect Multi-Style Regular Length Unscented Panty Liners (108 ct)

Always · Panty Liners

Always Daily Protect Multi-Style Regular Length Unscented Panty Liners (108 ct)

Poor

Waterproof period liners carry moderate PFAS concern; Always discloses nothing about coatings.

Verdict · SkipModerate PFAS concern in waterproof backing plus typical period-product unknowns; Always provides no transparency on coating chemistry or testing.

Always Daily liners include a waterproof backing where PFAS treatments typically hide in period care. The brand discloses nothing about coating chemistry or testing.

The better-graded swap

Kotex Wrapped Liners

Kotex

Kotex Wrapped Liners

70/100 safety

70Good

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Good.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonwoven/cellulose core with adhesive and waterproof backing (coating unspecified)

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Always Daily Protect Liners (108 ct) is made of, ingredients and materials

Always Daily Protect liners use a nonwoven cellulose core (absorbent layer) bonded to an adhesive strip and a waterproof backing layer. The backing coating is unspecified by the brand, which is the critical gap, waterproof coatings on period products commonly rely on fluorochemicals (PFAS) to repel liquids, but Always does not disclose whether theirs contains these or alternatives. The adhesive and any chemical treatments on the nonwoven also go undisclosed, leaving the full chemical load unknown to consumers.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Waterproof coatings on menstrual products commonly contain PFOA, PFOS, or other PFAS "forever chemicals" to repel liquids. Always provides no disclosure of coating composition, making PFAS presence highly probable though unconfirmed for this specific SKU. Chronic PFAS exposure is linked to reproductive and immune effects.

Source, ATSDR ↗
20/ 100
⛏️

Adhesive leachables and skin contact sensitization

The adhesive strip composition is not disclosed. Period-product adhesives may contain acrylates, epoxies, or other chemical agents that can off-gas or migrate to skin over hours of wear. Some users report contact dermatitis; the unscented formula reduces fragrance allergen load but does not address adhesive chemistry.

70/ 100
🫧

Microplastic and nonwoven polymer shedding

Nonwoven fabrics in disposable liners can fragment or shed microfibers during use and disposal, particularly if the backing degrades. These fragments are not tracked or disclosed by Always and may contribute to internal exposure or environmental burden.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No recalls or public reports of formaldehyde in Always liners specifically. However, nonwoven fabrics are often treated with formaldehyde-based resins for wet-strength. Always does not confirm absence, so risk cannot be ruled out without independent testing.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

Cellulose cores may contain trace metals if bleached with chlorine compounds or if source pulp is contaminated. No specific testing or concerns have been reported for Always products, but disclosure of pulp sourcing and treatment would clarify this.

Source, FDA ↗
95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Always (Procter & Gamble subsidiary) has published no safety data sheets, material transparency reports, or PFAS testing results for this or similar products. The brand does not list certifications from third-party safety bodies (e.g., STANDARD 100 by OEKO-TEX, which tests for restricted substances). P&G has faced historical criticism for opacity on period-product ingredients and has not addressed PFAS concern in marketed materials, treating it as standard industry practice rather than a transparency issue.

How it compares in its category

Most disposable panty liners carry identical risks, opaque waterproof backings and undisclosed adhesives. Brands like Seventh Generation and some EU-manufactured alternatives publish toxicology data or avoid fluorochemicals entirely, making them marginally more transparent. Always is mainstream and widely available but sits at the lower end of disclosure standards compared to niche organic or certified-safe competitors. The unscented variant eliminates fragrance allergen risk, a modest advantage, but does not address the core coating uncertainty.

If you buy it

Use as directed without heating or exposing to temperatures above 60C (product is not designed for heat and may degrade or off-gas). Replace immediately if the backing peels, tears, or shows signs of wear, as degraded coatings can increase microparticle and chemical shedding. Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight to prevent adhesive breakdown. If skin irritation develops, discontinue use and consider a transparent alternative brand to identify the culprit.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Always has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Always Daily Protect Multi-Style Regular Length Unscented Panty Liners (108 ct)?

Kotex Core Daily Wrapped Liners

Kotex

Core Daily Wrapped Liners

70GoodPFAS grade
  • cotton, rayon, adhesive (nonwoven blend)
  • Synthetic adhesive leachables

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Kotex Wrapped Liners

Kotex

Wrapped Liners

70GoodPFAS grade
  • Cellulose/cotton absorbent core with adhesive backing
  • Adhesive skin contact sensitization

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

More panty liners grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.