Bodyform Maxi Pads - Long - Wings
Skip until brand discloses PFAS testing or third-party verification.
Bodyform does not publicly disclose PFAS content or testing for this pad. Period products often use water-resistant backings that may contain PFAS, but no information is available for this specific product.
The better-graded swap
Seventh Generation
Seventh Generation Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
100/100 safety
Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.
Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.
Material
Cellulose, absorbent core, backing layer
Brand disclosure
Brand is silent on PFAS
Lab data
No public lab test
You may also be interested in
Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.
Aqua Pure
3M Aqua-Pure AP802B Whole House Filter Housing
- polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial growth in spent cartridges
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Aquasure
Premier Series 75 GPD Under Sink Reverse Osmosis Water Filtration System
- RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters
4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Avocado
Vegan Mattress
- organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Heavy metals
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
What Bodyform Maxi Pads - Long - Wings is made of, ingredients and materials
Bodyform Maxi Pads use cellulose as the primary absorbent core, a plant-derived material with a long history in period care. The backing layer is typically a polyethylene or polypropylene film that creates a moisture barrier. Cellulose itself does not leach heavy metals or endocrine disruptors under normal use; however, the adhesives, bleaching agents, and any dyes or coatings applied during manufacturing can introduce contaminants. Wings are usually a non-woven fabric or thin film extension designed to prevent leakage onto underwear.
What’s concerning
Category baseline
The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.
No PFAS disclosure
No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.
Adhesive allergens and acrylates
The adhesive used to attach wings and secure the pad to underwear often contains acrylate polymers, which can cause contact dermatitis in sensitive individuals. Bodyform does not publicly disclose the specific adhesive formulation; hypoallergenic or hypoallergenic-marketed pads may use less irritating alternatives, but this product's adhesive composition is not publicly available.
Fragrance and synthetic odor control agents
Some Bodyform maxi pad variants are scented; fragrance blends can include undisclosed allergens and volatile organic compounds. The scented versions carry higher risk of vulvovaginal irritation than unscented alternatives; unscented Bodyform pads avoid this hazard.
PFAS
PFAS compounds (perfluorinated chemicals) are commonly used in the backing film or wing material of conventional menstrual pads to enhance water repellency. Bodyform has not disclosed whether its products contain PFAS or the results of testing for these chemicals; independent studies have detected PFAS in unnamed period pads, suggesting industry-wide use of these persistent chemicals.
Source, ATSDR ↗What’s reassuring
Bleaching residues and dioxins
Cellulose pads are typically bleached with chlorine or oxygen-based agents during manufacturing. No dioxin contamination has been reported in Bodyform pads on record, but industry-wide testing has historically found trace amounts in conventional bleached menstrual products; oxygen-bleached or elemental chlorine-free (ECF) processing reduces this risk.
Plastic film degradation and microparticles
The polyethylene or polypropylene backing layer can degrade over time or if exposed to high heat, potentially releasing microplastics. No testing for microplastic release from Bodyform pads during normal use or storage is on record; risk is theoretical rather than documented.
The full breakdown
The brand's record and disclosure
Bodyform is owned by Edgewell Personal Care and operates in a category where ingredient transparency has historically lagged behind other personal care segments. The brand has not publicly released independent testing data for PFAS, phthalates, or other synthetic chemicals in its products. Bodyform has made environmental commitments (packaging reduction, sustainability goals) but has not disclosed results of third-party chemical audits or provided detailed material safety certificates for menstrual products.
How it compares in its category
Period pads marketed as organic (e.g., Seventh Generation, Veeda) typically disclose materials more explicitly and undergo third-party certification for pesticide residues and chlorine-free processing. Bodyform pads are positioned as mainstream/mass-market, which means they compete on absorbency and cost rather than transparency. No public recalls or widespread safety complaints specific to Bodyform maxi pads are on record, but the category as a whole has seen growing scrutiny for undisclosed additives and PFAS use in water-repellent layers.
If you buy it
Store pads in a cool, dry place away from high heat or humidity to prevent degradation of the backing film. Change pads every 4 to 8 hours during use to reduce prolonged contact with any residual manufacturing chemicals and to minimize odor. If you experience unexplained vulvovaginal irritation, itching, or rash, discontinue use and consult a healthcare provider; menstrual products can occasionally trigger contact dermatitis from adhesives or fragrances, though unscented Bodyform variants carry lower risk. Consider requesting the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) or ingredient list from the manufacturer if you have specific sensitivities.
What we don’t know
- Basis
- Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
- Lab test
- None on record for this exact product
- Brand statement
- Bodyform has made none
Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.
Better-graded alternatives in Period Pads
Seventh Generation
Chlorine Free Maxi Pads
- organic cotton, wood pulp
- The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
- Fragrance allergen content
Nana
Maxi Thick
- cellulose, cotton blend, absorbent core
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Bleach residues and processing chemicals in cellulose
3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
Kotex Natural
10pack Kotex Natural Normal Sanitary Pads
- Cotton, wood pulp absorbent core, plastic backing
- We found no PFAS statement from the brand
- Pesticide residue
2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.
More period pads grades
How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.