PFAS40/ 100Poor
Overall10/ 100Bad
Bridgestone Golf E Glove

Bridgestone · Golf Balls & Equipment

Bridgestone Golf E Glove

Poor

Bridgestone silent on PFAS; waterproof golf gloves often use water-repellent coating treatments.

Verdict · SkipBridgestone Golf E Glove uses water-repellent coating-treated leather/synthetics with silent PFAS stance; standard hazards manageable with proper care and replacement.

Golf gloves typically feature water-resistant coatings containing PFAS. Bridgestone makes no public PFAS disclosure, so contacting the brand before buying is recommended.

The better-graded swap

Spalding Pack

Spalding

Spalding Pack

85/100 safety

85Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

leather, synthetic leather, or fabric with waterproof treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

90/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating/Fluorinated water-repellent coating

Waterproof golf gloves almost certainly use fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes; Bridgestone has not disclosed alternatives. water-repellent coating efficacy typically degrades within 1-2 seasons, at which point fluorine shedding into sweat and environment increases.

20/ 100
💨

Adhesive VOCs and off-gassing

Glue bonding synthetic overlays to leather or leather-to-backing can emit low-level volatile organic compounds, especially when new or exposed to warmth from hand contact and friction. Proper ventilation during initial use mitigates exposure.

70/ 100

Synthetic leather degradation products

If the glove incorporates polyurethane or PVC synthetic leather, mechanical breakdown from flexing and sweat exposure can generate microparticles and leachable plasticizers over the product lifetime. Incidence and concentration unknown for this specific product.

70/ 100
⚠️

Mold and microbial growth if improperly stored

Leather and synthetic materials retain moisture; sealed or damp storage environments promote fungal and bacterial colonization. This is a use-and-care issue rather than inherent chemical hazard, but relevant to glove longevity and skin contact safety.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

⛏️

Heavy metals

No public incidents or testing data specific to Bridgestone golf gloves. Leather tanning can involve chromium or other metals, but levels in finished, dried leather are typically below dermal absorption thresholds in normal use; no brand-specific concern is established.

Source, FDA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Bridgestone Golf E Glove uses a combination of leather (typically cabretta or synthetic leather) with synthetic overlays, bonded with adhesives and finished with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) treatment. The water-repellent coating is the primary chemical exposure point; these treatments historically relied on Teflon-type coating-based or fluorinated compounds to repel moisture. Leather itself is generally inert once tanned and dried, but adhesives used in glove construction and any synthetic leather base can off-gas low levels of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), particularly when new or exposed to heat and sweat.

The brand's record and disclosure

Bridgestone has not published specific material safety data or PFAS reduction commitments for golf equipment as of available public records. The company manufactures tires and sports equipment globally and has faced scrutiny on environmental practices, but transparency on chemical content in finished golf gloves remains absent. No major recalls or documented chemical safety incidents involving Bridgestone golf gloves have been publicly reported, suggesting baseline manufacturing compliance, but absence of disclosure does not indicate absence of concern.

How it compares in its category

Golf gloves as a category universally use water-repellent coating treatments, making PFAS or fluorinated alternatives standard across most brands (Callaway, TaylorMade, FootJoy). The Bridgestone Golf E Glove sits in the mid-market segment; premium alternatives sometimes advertise PFAS-free water-repellent coating, while budget options may use older fluorinated chemistries. Leather golf gloves generally pose lower off-gassing risk than synthetic leather or heavy neoprene alternatives, provided they are well-ventilated during the break-in period.

If you buy it

Air out the glove for 24-48 hours indoors before extended skin contact to allow initial VOC off-gassing from adhesives and finishes. Wash with warm water and mild soap after use to remove sweat and contaminants that can degrade the water-repellent coating and adhesive integrity. Replace the glove when the water-repellent coating no longer beads water effectively (typically 1-2 seasons of regular play), as degradation increases moisture ingress and mold risk. Store in a dry, well-ventilated space; damp or sealed storage accelerates degradation and microbial growth.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Bridgestone has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Golf Balls & Equipment

Vice Drip Golf Balls

Vice Golf

Vice Drip Golf Balls

synthetic polymer core with urethane/elastomer cover

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade85Excellent
Excellent

PFAS unlikely. Brand silent on composition details.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Bridgestone

Men's Pair Golf Gloves

Leather, synthetic leather, or textile blend

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
⚠️

Chromium in leather tanning residue

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes in colored leather or synthetic components

Limited concern

70
⛏️

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70

Lower PFAS concern, but brand provides no transparency.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

Bridgestone Lady Golf Glove

Bridgestone

Lady Golf Glove

Synthetic leather or leather with standard stitching

PFAS Grade85Excellent
Overall Grade59Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding from synthetic leather

Limited concern

70

Golf glove with typical materials, lower concern profile.

Brand says nothing about PFAS

More golf balls & equipment grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.