PFAS70/ 100Good
Overall62/ 100Good
DAME Regular Cotton Tampons 16 Pack

Dame · Tampons

DAME Regular Cotton Tampons 16 Pack

Good

Lower concern. Cotton core poses minimal PFAS risk.

Verdict · BuyCotton tampons with lower PFAS concern and no established hazards on record; standard absorbent hygiene product with routine care.

DAME Regular tampons are cotton-based with no known Teflon-family coating coatings or water-repellent treatments. Brand does not claim PFAS-free status, but primary material carries lower inherent risk.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

cotton

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What DAME Regular Cotton Tampons 16 Pack is made of, ingredients and materials

Dame Regular Cotton Tampons are constructed from cotton fibers, a natural cellulose material that does not chemically break down or leach into the body during normal menstrual use. Cotton is absorbent by its fiber structure, not by chemical coating or treatment; the material itself poses minimal risk of leaching synthetic compounds. The applicator (not specified here as plastic or cardboard in public records) may carry separate concerns if plastic, but the absorbent core is the primary contact material.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

75/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Bacterial colonization and toxic shock syndrome (TSS) risk

Inherent to all tampons regardless of material; risk increases with prolonged wear (>8 hours) or high absorbency mismatch. Cotton alone does not increase or decrease TSS risk compared to other materials; usage pattern is the primary driver.

70/ 100
⛏️

Applicator material leaching (if plastic)

Applicator composition is not disclosed in available product documentation. If plastic, BPA or phthalate exposure is theoretically possible but unlikely given brief contact and non-heated context; cardboard applicators carry no known chemical hazard.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Base material not linked to PFAS

The main material recorded for this product is not one associated with PFAS.

100/ 100
🐛

Pesticide residue

No specific testing results or contamination records are publicly available for Dame Regular Cotton Tampons. Conventional (non-organic) cotton may carry pesticide residues from cultivation, but intravaginal exposure levels are not established as hazardous in published research.

Source, EPA ↗
95/ 100
✅

Bleach or chlorine dioxide residues in processing

Dame does not publicly state whether this product is bleach-free or processed with chlorine dioxide. Standard tampon processing may leave trace residues, but no recall or adverse event data is on record for this brand or product line.

95/ 100
✅

Allergic reaction to cotton or residual dyes

Cotton is hypoallergenic and rarely triggers contact dermatitis. No documented allergen warnings or recall history exists for this product; individual sensitivity remains possible but not established as a product-specific concern.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Dame Products maintains a direct-to-consumer brand positioning with emphasis on material transparency. The company does not publicly disclose comprehensive third-party certifications (such as Organic, GOTS, or FDA clearance statements) in widely available sources. No established safety recalls or contamination incidents are on record for this product line. The brand's PFAS stance is not formally documented in public statements, leaving disclosure gaps around their supply-chain testing or standards compliance.

How it compares in its category

Standard cotton tampons from all brands carry similar material profiles; the differentiation rests on applicator type (plastic vs. cardboard vs. applicator-free) and certification status (organic, bleach-free, allergen-tested). Dame's regular cotton offering sits in the middle of market offerings, not marketed as organic or certified, but also without reported contamination. Competitors with third-party certifications (Cora, Seventh Generation) provide additional assurance; Dame's lack of visible certification is a gap, not an established defect.

If you buy it

Use one tampon per application and replace every 4-8 hours to reduce bacterial overgrowth risk and toxic shock syndrome risk (standard guidance for all tampons). Store in a dry environment away from direct heat or humidity to prevent mold or bacterial colonization of the package. Discontinue use and seek medical advice if signs of irritation, allergic reaction, or unusual discharge occur. No special heating, washing, or maintenance applies; dispose of used tampons in household waste or composting systems where permitted.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 78% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Dame has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Tampons

Natracare 100% Organic Cotton Tampons

Natracare

100% Organic Cotton Tampons

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE✓ FSC Certified
  • 100% organic cotton
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Heavy metals
Natracare Organic Super Plus Tampons, 3 x 20 ct

Natracare

Organic Super Plus Tampons, 3 x 20 ct

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Vegan Society Certified
  • organic cotton, cardboard applicator
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Dioxins from bleaching
Natracare Organic Cotton Super Plus Tampons

Natracare

Organic Cotton Super Plus Tampons

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ Organic Cotton Certification✓ MADE SAFE Certified
  • organic cotton, no added fluorochemicals
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Verified PFAS-free by a third party

More tampons grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.