PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Endura MT500 Waterproof Jacket Men's

Endura · Cycling Rain Jackets

Endura MT500 Waterproof Jacket Men's

Bad

Skip until Endura clarifies waterproof coating composition.

Verdict · SkipPFAS coating is the primary concern (skip pending clarification), but polyester textiles carry low-to-moderate formaldehyde and azo dye risk if poorly finished; brand disclosure is weak.

Endura MT500 uses a waterproof treatment but does not disclose whether it contains PFAS. Uncoated polyester base is lower concern, but coating source remains unknown.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with waterproof coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What Endura MT500 Waterproof Jacket Men's is made of, ingredients and materials

The MT500 is polyester with an unspecified waterproof coating. Polyester itself is stable, but the waterproof treatment is the critical unknown, most outdoor jackets use either PFAS-based (fluorocarbon) coatings or polyurethane or wax-based coatings not linked to PFAS. Endura has not publicly disclosed which technology is in this model. The coating is what creates water resistance but also the primary chemical exposure risk.

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Polyester textiles are often treated with formaldehyde-containing resins for wrinkle resistance and dimensional stability. Endura does not advertise formaldehyde-free processing. The risk is modest with conventional handling but increases with heat exposure or repeated washing in hot water.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
🎨

Heavy metals

The jacket's color is achieved via synthetic dyes; if azo-based and poorly fixed, they can release aromatic amines under sweat or friction. No specific brand certifications (like OEKO-TEX) are noted, so heavy metal content of pigments is unverified.

Source, FDA ↗
70/ 100
🍳

Waterproof coating volatilization and migration

Polyurethane and fluorocarbon coatings can off-gas volatile organic compounds (VOCs), especially during first wear and in warm conditions. This is distinct from PFAS leaching and typically decreases after initial off-gassing, but intensity depends on coating type and curing, neither disclosed here.

45/ 100
🫧

Coating degradation releasing particles

As the waterproof layer wears, micro-flaking of polymer particles can occur, particularly at seams and high-friction areas. Long-term inhalation risk is low, but particles are not biodegradable and represent end-of-life contamination.

70/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

Endura is a UK-based cycling apparel brand with no publicly available statements on PFAS elimination, alternatives, or third-party testing transparency. The company does not advertise PFAS-free certifications (such as OEKO-TEX or bluesign) on this product. This silence is a red flag in an industry where transparency on waterproof chemistry is increasingly standard among safety-conscious competitors.

How it compares in its category

Waterproof cycling jackets are among the most chemically intensive garment categories. Competitors like Patagonia, Arc'teryx, and Rab have publicly committed to PFAS elimination or phased removal, with some offering certified PFAS-free lines. Endura's lack of disclosure places it below the transparency standard of premium outdoor brands, though many mid-market jackets remain similarly opaque.

If you buy it

Wash separately from other garments in cool water (do not dry-clean, which can degrade coatings and increase chemical leaching). Avoid machine drying and high heat; air dry to extend coating life. Inspect seams and coating annually for wear; once the waterproof layer degrades, the garment should be replaced rather than re-treated at home. Request product documentation from Endura specifying the coating chemistry before purchase if PFAS exposure is a concern.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Endura has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Cycling Rain Jackets

Patagonia Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Women's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • polyester shell with water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Azo dyes and color fastness

4 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Dirt Roamer Storm Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • nylon/polyester with water-repellent coating water treatment
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • PFAS

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Patagonia Men's Trail Craft Jacket

Patagonia

Men's Trail Craft Jacket

45PoorPFAS grade
  • Nylon with water-repellent coating water-repellent coating finish
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • water-repellent coating chemistry opacity (fluorinated vs. non-fluorinated)

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More cycling rain jackets grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.