PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer- Brief Underwear 3-Pack

Old Navy · Sports Performance Undergarments

Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer- Brief Underwear 3-Pack

Bad

Performance underwear likely uses water-repellent coating; Gap discloses nothing about PFAS.

Verdict · SkipNylon/polyester blend with undisclosed moisture-wicking chemistry; PFAS risk present but manageable with proper laundering. Brand transparency is weak.

Go-Dry labeling indicates a moisture management coating typical in athletic underwear. Old Navy provides no PFAS transparency, leaving treatment chemistry unknown.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nylon/polyester blend with moisture-wicking treatment

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

You may also be interested in

Top-graded picks in the categories readers replace first, every one scored on the same rubric.

  • polypropylene filter housing, carbon/sediment cartridge
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial growth in spent cartridges

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

  • RO membrane, carbon filters, stainless steel housing
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Bacterial and microbial growth in housing and filters

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Avocado Vegan Mattress

Avocado

Vegan Mattress

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified✓ Global Organic Textile Standard (GOTS)
  • organic cotton, natural latex, coconut coir, recycled steel coils
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Heavy metals

2 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

What Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Underwear 3-Pack is made of, ingredients and materials

This product is a nylon/polyester blend engineered with a moisture-wicking treatment to pull sweat away from skin. Performance underwear blends typically use synthetic fibers because natural fibers (cotton, wool) absorb rather than repel moisture, making them uncomfortable during activity. The treatment chemistry is not disclosed by Old Navy or Gap, which is the primary concern; moisture-wicking finishes in this category often rely on water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) coatings that may contain fluorinated compounds (addressed separately as PFAS) or other surfactants.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Moisture-wicking treatments sometimes rely on formaldehyde-based cross-linking resins to fix hydrophobic or hydrophilic polymers to fiber surfaces. Old Navy does not disclose the finish chemistry, so presence cannot be ruled out. Exposure is typically minimal after initial laundering but can cause skin irritation in sensitive individuals.

Source, ATSDR ↗
70/ 100
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Polyester is synthesized using antimony trioxide as a catalyst; residual antimony may remain in finished fiber at trace levels (typically <0.1% but not guaranteed). Migration to skin under sweat conditions is very low but not independently tested for this product. No regulatory limit applies to antimony in textiles in most jurisdictions.

70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during laundering

Synthetic blends like nylon/polyester shed microfibers during every wash cycle, contributing to microplastic pollution. This is not a direct health risk to the wearer but a lifecycle concern; damage to product (pilling, wear) accelerates shedding.

20/ 100
🏷️

Skin sensitization from undisclosed chemical treatments

Without disclosure of the moisture-wicking treatment agents, potential skin contact with residual surfactants, catalysts, or cross-linking compounds cannot be fully assessed. Incidence is rare but documented in some users of performance athletic wear; discontinuation and laundering typically resolve symptoms.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

✅

Azo dyes and synthetic dye residues

No specific recalls or reported incidents for Old Navy boxer-briefs involving azo dyes. Nylon and polyester typically accept synthetic dyes without prohibited carcinogenic azo compounds, but pre-production testing data is not publicly available for this product line.

95/ 100

How is this PFAS grade calculated?

The brand's record and disclosure

Gap Inc. has not published a PFAS disclosure policy or commitment to phasing out fluorinated finishes in apparel as of available public records. The company does not certify this product to recognized textile safety standards (Oeko-Tex, GOTS, Bluesign). Gap's broader sustainability reporting focuses on labor and environmental impact of manufacturing but does not address chemical composition of performance treatments. This silence on treatment chemistry is standard for the mass-market athletic basics segment but represents a gap in consumer transparency.

How it compares in its category

Performance boxer-briefs in the budget-to-mid segment ($15-25 per pack) rarely disclose treatment chemistry; this product is typical in that respect. Premium alternatives (Patagonia, Allbirds, some brands certified to Oeko-Tex) explicitly limit or eliminate fluorinated water-repellent coating finishes and publish material sourcing. Gap's offering is competitively priced and functionally adequate for everyday moisture-wicking but offers less chemical transparency than certified competitors. For the price point, transparency expectation is lower than premium brands, but not zero.

If you buy it

Wash in warm water without fabric softener, which degrades moisture-wicking performance and can trap chemicals. Avoid high heat drying (tumble dry low or air dry); heat can accelerate breakdown of synthetic coatings and increase potential leaching. Replace when elastic degrades or odor persists after washing, typically 1-2 years of regular use. If you experience skin irritation (rare but possible with formaldehyde-based resin finishes), discontinue and rinse thoroughly before wearing.

What is not known about PFAS in this product?

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Old Navy has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

What are the PFAS-free alternatives to Old Navy Men's Go-Dry Cool Performance Boxer- Brief Underwear 3-Pack?

  • Cotton/polyester blend socks, no waterproofing
  • Azo dyes

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • 100% cotton
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Azo dyes and residual dye chemicals

3 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon
  • Supima cotton, no surface treatment disclosed
  • We found no PFAS statement from the brand
  • Formaldehyde / VOCs

4 hazards checked on this product, all on its full breakdown.

Find an alternative on Amazon

More sports performance undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.