PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall12/ 100Bad
lululemon Always In Motion Boxer 5

Lululemon · Sports Performance Undergarments

lululemon Always In Motion Boxer 5

Bad

Lululemon silent on PFAS; water-repellent coating treatment raises concern.

Verdict · SkipNylon blend with water-repellent coating finish raises PFAS concern; brand silence on chemical treatment is a red flag. Non-PFAS hazards minimal if cared for properly.

This nylon boxer features a durable water-resistant finish. Lululemon stays silent on PFAS and water-repellent coating chemistry, though water-repellent finishes commonly use PFAS.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nylon blend with water-repellent coating finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent coating treatments have historically used PFAS.

65/ 100
♾️

PFAS

Nylon water-repellent coating finishes historically use long-chain PFAS; Lululemon's current formulation is undisclosed. Short-chain PFAS or non-fluorinated alternatives exist but cannot be confirmed for this product without brand clarification. Risk is inhalation exposure during manufacturing or wear, and persistence in soil/water if garment is discarded.

Source, ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Elastane (spandex) degradation and microfiber shedding

Spandex components degrade with heat, chlorine, and UV exposure, accelerating microfiber release during washing. The 12% elastane in this blend makes it susceptible to microfiber loss, particularly if tumble-dried at high heat or exposed to pool chemicals. This is not specific to Lululemon but inherent to nylon-elastane athletic wear.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

No reports of formaldehyde resin finishes or formaldehyde-releasing dyes in Lululemon nylon apparel. Nylon-spandex blends do not inherently require formaldehyde; the risk would be in dyeing processes, which Lululemon does not appear to have flagged in testing or recalls.

Source, ATSDR
95/ 100
⛏️

Heavy metals

No established reports of restricted azo dyes or heavy metal pigment contamination in this product or brand. Lululemon typically sources certified dyes, though full supply chain transparency is limited.

Source, FDA
95/ 100
🔥

Flame retardants

Athletic shorts are not typically treated with flame retardants unless marketed specifically for that purpose. No evidence of flame retardant application in the Always In Motion Boxer 5.

Source, EPA
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The Always In Motion Boxer 5 is constructed from a nylon-elastane blend (likely 88% nylon, 12% spandex or similar ratio typical of Lululemon athletic shorts). The water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the outer nylon surface is the primary chemical concern. water-repellent coating treatments historically relied on long-chain PFAS compounds; newer formulations may use short-chain PFAS or non-fluorinated alternatives, but Lululemon has not disclosed which process they use. Nylon itself is stable in normal wear and washing, but the finish is where chemical exposure risk concentrates.

The brand's record and disclosure

Lululemon does not publicly disclose water-repellent coating treatment chemistry or commit to PFAS-free standards for most product lines, despite industry movement toward transparency. The brand has faced scrutiny from environmental groups over chemical opacity but has not issued recalls or warnings specific to this product. No established formaldehyde, azo dye, or antimony contamination has been reported in their nylon apparel. However, the silent stance on water-repellent coating chemistry contrasts with competitors (e.g.who now specify finishes with lower concern regarding PFAS or PFC compounds.

How it compares in its category

Athletic shorts in this price and performance tier commonly use nylon with water-repellent coating finish; the risk profile is typical rather than exceptional. Many mainstream brands (Nike, Adidas, Lululemon) have not yet committed to PFAS-free water repellency across all lines, though premium outdoor brands have begun the transition. The real differentiation is disclosure, Lululemon's refusal to specify treatment chemistry puts this product in a weaker transparency position than explicitly PFAS-free alternatives from smaller brands or premium outdoor companies.

If you buy it

Wash in cold water with mild detergent; avoid fabric softener, which can degrade water-repellent coating. Do not tumble-dry on high heat, as this can damage the nylon and potentially degrade the finish. The water-repellent coating will wear down after 20-30 washes; reapplication with commercial products may reintroduce PFAS, so consider line-drying and spot-cleaning to extend life. If environmental or health concerns about water-repellent coating chemicals matter to you, contact Lululemon directly requesting treatment-chemistry disclosure before purchase.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Lululemon has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Sports Performance Undergarments

Reebok Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

Reebok

Women's Air Tech Performance Brief Panties 6-Pack

nylon, spandex, cotton blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade53Good
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🎨

Azo dyes

Limited concern

70

Elastomer degradation (spandex breakdown)

Limited concern

70

Lower concern with no known PFAS triggers identified.

Starting grade for this product type

Reebok Women's Seamless Hipster

Reebok

Women's Seamless Hipster

nylon/elastane blend, seamless knit

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade59Good

Elastane degradation and skin contact

Limited concern

70

Basic seamless intimate wear lacks water-resistant coatings.

Starting grade for this product type

Reebok Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

Reebok

Men's Featherweight Performance Boxer Briefs

polyester and elastane blend

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester synthesis

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding during washing

Limited concern

70

Polyester-elastane blend with no coating or water-repellent finish on record.

Starting grade for this product type

More sports performance undergarments grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.