PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Pan, Bake - 31230

Hamilton Beach · Bakeware

Pan, Bake - 31230

Bad

Unspecified nonstick coating raises concern; avoid until clarified.

Verdict: SkipUnspecified nonstick coating is the core issue; if Teflon-type coating-based, follow strict heat discipline. No other hazards on record for this model.

Hamilton Beach won't say what nonstick coating this pan has. Most nonstick cookware uses Teflon-type coating or Teflon-family coating unless explicitly marked ceramic or mineral.

The safe swap

Caraway Ceramic Nonstick Cookie Sheet

Caraway

Caraway Ceramic Nonstick Cookie Sheet

90/100 safety

90Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Nonstick coating, type unspecified

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Advertised as non-stick but coating type is not explained.

60/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

cookware is a category where PFAS exposure is more common.

70/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume risk (inhalation hazard if coating degrades)

Coating chemistry unspecified; if Teflon-type coating-based, overheating above 500F or physical damage can release gases. Baking pans rarely reach such temps in normal use, but broiler exposure or prolonged high-heat cooking poses a realistic risk.

70/ 100
🍂

Coating adhesion and peeling over time

No durability data published for this specific model. Nonstick coatings degrade with use; metal utensils, high heat, and dishwasher cycles accelerate failure, potentially releasing coating particles into food.

70/ 100
🏷️

PFAS

Hamilton Beach's silence on PFAS status is the defining risk here; the industry shift toward PFAS-free alternatives means this product's refusal to disclose creates justified consumer concern about older PFAS formulations.

Source: ATSDR
45/ 100

What’s reassuring

Aluminum substrate leaching

Standard aluminum bakeware does not leach aluminum into food under normal baking conditions (acidic foods and prolonged contact are the main risk factors, both atypical for baking pans).

95/ 100
🧠

Lead

No records of lead or cadmium contamination in Hamilton Beach nonstick bakeware. This hazard is rare in modern U.S. bakeware but is relevant to vintage or imported cookware.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

Hamilton Beach model 31230 is a nonstick baking pan, but the coating chemistry is not publicly specified by the manufacturer. Nonstick coatings on bakeware typically fall into two families: Teflon-type coating-based (traditional Teflon-type) or ceramic/silicone hybrids. Teflon-type coating coatings release toxic fumes (chiefly perfluorooctanoic acid precursors) above 500F; baking pans rarely reach that in normal home use, but broiler or direct flame exposure can trigger degradation. The lack of transparency about which type Hamilton Beach uses here creates uncertainty about long-term coating stability and fume risk.

The brand's record and disclosure

Hamilton Beach does not publicly maintain a PFAS or PFOA transparency statement, and has not voluntarily committed to phasing out fluorinated nonstick coatings. The company has not faced major recalls for nonstick bakeware, but absence of disclosure does not mean absence of PFAS. No third-party certifications (e.g., GREENGUARD, NSF) are listed for this product. This silence is the primary concern, as competitors increasingly disclose coating type and PFAS content.

How it compares in its category

Most major bakeware brands (Pyrex, USA Pan, OXO, Le Creuset) either use ceramic or stoneware, or explicitly state they use Teflon-type coating-free alternatives. Hamilton Beach's refusal to specify the coating type places this pan in a lower-transparency tier. Budget nonstick bakeware often defaults to older Teflon-type coating formulations; premium alternatives (ceramic, silicone, carbon steel) carry no fluorochemical risk and often outperform in durability.

If you buy it

Never exceed 400F; avoid broiler use or direct stovetop heating. Inspect the coating monthly for scratches, peeling, or discoloration; discard immediately if compromised. Hand wash only; dishwasher abrasion accelerates coating failure. Store away from heat sources. If you plan to keep it beyond 3-5 years, request manufacturer confirmation of coating type before purchase; otherwise, consider a ceramic or stoneware alternative for peace of mind.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Hamilton Beach has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Bakeware

Caraway Ceramic Baking Sheet

Caraway

Ceramic Baking Sheet

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade88Excellent

Coating degradation and metal substrate exposure

Limited concern

70
🔩

Aluminum substrate leaching (if aluminum core)

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal shock and coating fracturing

Limited concern

70

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

GreenPan

GreenLife Ceramic Nonstick Bakeware

Ceramic nonstick coating

PFAS Grade100Excellent
Overall Grade92Excellent
🔩

Coating degradation and aluminum leaching

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microcracking and ceramic particle shedding

Limited concern

70

Lower risk, ceramic nonstick avoids Teflon-type coating and PFOA.

MADE SAFE (product-specific)

Verified PFAS-free by a third party

Staub 4-Piece Baking Dish Set

Staub

4-Piece Baking Dish Set

enameled cast iron

PFAS Grade90Excellent
Overall Grade76Excellent

Enamel degradation and iron leaching

Limited concern

70
🍳

Thermal stress fracture of enamel

Moderate concern

45

Lower PFAS concern, enameled cast iron baking dishes without nonstick coating.

Risky category by default

More bakeware grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.