PFAS20/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
Hoka Men's GlideTech Short Sleeve Shirt

HOKA · Synthetic Athletic Wear

Hoka Men's GlideTech Short Sleeve Shirt

Bad

water-repellent coating-treated athletic wear, PFAS risk unconfirmed but likely present.

Verdict: SkipPolyester athletic shirt with water-repellent coating finish carries unconfirmed PFAS risk; no brand transparency on chemistry. Safe with proper laundering; monitor for degradation.

GlideTech Short Sleeve has polyester with water-repellent coating finish. Hoka has not disclosed PFAS use or absence; water-repellent coating-coated athletic wear commonly contains fluorinated repellents.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

Polyester with water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Waterproof / stain-resistant treatment

Water-repellent treatments have historically contained PFAS chemicals.

65/ 100
♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Antimony catalyst residue in polyester

Polyester is synthesized with antimony as a catalyst; trace residues can remain in the final fiber. HOKA does not publish antimony testing or removal protocols. Exposure during wear is considered minimal by regulatory bodies, but long-term skin contact is not quantified for this specific shirt.

70/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Some water-repellent coating and wrinkle-resistant finishes use formaldehyde-based resins, though modern athletic wear increasingly uses formaldehyde-free alternatives. HOKA's finish formulation is not disclosed, so presence cannot be ruled out.

Source: ATSDR
70/ 100
🫧

Microfiber shedding during laundering

Polyester athletic garments shed microplastics during washing, a documented phenomenon across the category. Wear and washing frequency drive shedding rate; this shirt will shed fibers in standard laundering. Microplastic risk to environment is established; human health impact from wearing the shirt itself is not.

45/ 100

Coating degradation and leaching after repeated washing

water-repellent coating finishes are not permanent and degrade with laundering cycles. As the coating breaks down, any residual monomers or additives could theoretically leach, though no data exists for HOKA products specifically. Washing frequency and water hardness affect degradation rate.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Azo dyes in polyester

No recalls or public testing data specific to HOKA GlideTech shirts for azo dye content. Polyester dyeing typically uses lower-risk colorants than natural fibers, but brand does not disclose dye chemistry.

95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

The GlideTech shirt is polyester with a water-repellent coating (water-repellent coating) finish applied to the fabric surface. water-repellent coating coatings on athletic wear traditionally use fluorochemical compounds to repel moisture, though HOKA has not publicly disclosed whether their formulation uses PFAS-based or PFAS-free alternatives. Polyester itself is chemically stable during normal wear, but the finish durability and composition after repeated washing is not documented by the brand.

The brand's record and disclosure

HOKA (a Decathlon-owned running brand) has not published detailed chemical disclosures or sustainability certifications specific to PFAS avoidance in apparel. The company does not appear on lists of brands with confirmed PFAS-free commitments or third-party chemical testing for this product line. Without direct manufacturer transparency, the water-repellent coating chemistry remains assumed rather than confirmed.

How it compares in its category

Most polyester athletic shirts with water-repellent coating finishes carry similar unconfirmed PFAS risk unless explicitly labeled PFAS-free or certified by organizations like Bluesign or GOTS. HOKA's positioning is typical for mid-range performance wear, offering function over documented chemical safety. Brands like Patagonia and some Decathlon house labels now offer PFAS-free water-repellent coating options, making this shirt less distinctive on that dimension.

If you buy it

Wash in cool water and avoid high-heat drying, as heat can accelerate any potential leaching from coatings. Inspect seams and surface finish annually for peeling or degradation, especially after 50+ washes, and retire the shirt if the water-repellent coating layer delaminates. Avoid washing with other delicate items if the coating is visibly flaking. Standard gentle detergent and air drying will extend both garment life and minimize any chemical exposure pathways.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 45% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
HOKA has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Safer alternatives in Synthetic Athletic Wear

Arc'teryx Men's Cormac Logo Shirt

Arc'teryx

Men's Cormac Logo Shirt

100% polyester knit, no water-repellent treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade47Poor
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Moderate concern

45

Lower concern, basic polyester shirt with no water-repellent coating finish.

Risky category by default

Hoka Men's Race Day Singlet

HOKA

Men's Race Day Singlet

polyester mesh and fabric

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade43Poor
🎨

Heavy metals

Limited concern

70
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding on wear and wash

Moderate concern

45
⚠️

Antimony in polyester polymer

Limited concern

70

Lower concern, no waterproofing or water-repellent coating treatment typical for race singlets.

Risky category by default

HOKA Men's Race Day Singlet Crew Neck Running Tank top

HOKA

Men's Race Day Singlet Crew Neck Running Tank top

Polyester/nylon blend athletic knit, no disclosed water-repellent coating or stain treatment

PFAS Grade65Good
Overall Grade57Good
⚠️

Antimony in polyester

Limited concern

70
🫧

Microplastic shedding

Limited concern

70

Minimal concern; no performance coatings on this running tank.

Risky category by default

More synthetic athletic wear grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.