PFAS15/ 100Bad
Overall0/ 100Bad
KitchenAid Professional-Grade Nonstick Jellyroll Pan and Baking Sheet

Kitchenaid · Bakeware

KitchenAid Professional-Grade Nonstick Jellyroll Pan and Baking Sheet

Bad

Nonstick coating chemistry not disclosed, raising concern about possible PFAS.

Verdict · SkipNonstick coating chemistry undisclosed; Teflon-type coating fume risk and coating degradation present but manageable with proper use and maintenance.

KitchenAid's nonstick coating on this jellyroll pan is not specified. The brand has no PFAS statement on record. Nonstick coatings without disclosed chemistry may contain PFAS.

The better-graded swap

Caraway Ceramic Nonstick Baking Sheet Duo

Caraway

Caraway Ceramic Nonstick Baking Sheet Duo

100/100 safety

100Excellent

Same rubric that flunked this product. The swap earned Excellent.

Still want this one anyway? Check the price on Amazon. We’d swap it.

Material

nonstick coating (type unspecified)

Lab data

No public lab test

Is KitchenAid Professional-Grade Nonstick non-toxic? What it is made of

KitchenAid has not publicly specified whether this pan uses Teflon-type coating (Teflon-based) or another nonstick polymer. The jellyroll pan is typically a shallow, flat aluminum or steel substrate with a nonstick topcoat applied industrially. Without disclosure, the exact resin chemistry and whether it contains PFAS-class fluorinated compounds cannot be confirmed from available sources. The coating durability and leaching profile depend entirely on formulation and adherence quality, both opaque here.

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

The starting point for this type of product, before anything specific to this product is counted.

70/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

No public statement from the brand about PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
♾️

Non-stick, chemistry undisclosed

Marketed as non-stick without stating the coating chemistry.

60/ 100
♾️

Teflon-type coating fume inhalation risk

If this pan uses Teflon-type coating, overheating above manufacturer specification (typically 400-500°F) can decompose the polymer and release perfluorooctane and other volatile compounds. KitchenAid's silence on coating type prevents confirmation, but the risk is standard for conventional nonstick cookware used improperly.

70/ 100
⏳

Coating degradation and substrate leaching

Mechanical damage or prolonged use can expose underlying aluminum or steel substrate; bare aluminum in acidic foods (tomato sauce, vinegar) may leach trace aluminum into food. No field reports specific to KitchenAid jellyroll pans, but this is a known failure mode for all nonstick cookware with thin coatings.

70/ 100
⛏️

Unspecified additive leaching

Without disclosure of the nonstick resin type and processing aids, it is impossible to rule out leaching of non-PFAS additives (plasticizers, slip agents, or curing residues) into high-fat foods or acidic baking preparations. The lack of third-party testing data or certifications leaves this unquantified.

70/ 100
💨

Off-gassing during initial use or high heat

New nonstick cookware may emit minor VOCs during the first few uses or at temperature extremes. This is typically mild and transient but unpleasant and poorly characterized for this specific product.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

🧠

Lead

No recalls or documented contamination in KitchenAid cookware; modern US manufacturing typically excludes these metals. However, the absence of explicit material certifications makes full assurance impossible without direct lab analysis.

Source, ATSDR ↗
95/ 100

The full breakdown

The brand's record and disclosure

KitchenAid (Whirlpool Corporation subsidiary) does not publicly disclose nonstick coating chemistry or PFAS content for its cookware lines. The brand has faced no major recalls specific to nonstick coating failures or chemical leaching, but silence on formulation is a transparency red flag in an era of PFAS regulation and consumer awareness. No third-party certifications (e.g., GreenGuard, NSF) are visible for this product line.

How it compares in its category

Premium nonstick bakeware from major brands (All-Clad, Calphalon, Rachael Ray) also rarely disclose coating type publicly, making this par for the industry rather than an outlier. Some competitors now advertise PFOA-free or ceramic/mineral coatings; KitchenAid's silence suggests conventional formulation. Stainless steel or cast iron alternatives offer no nonstick coating hazard but require different technique and maintenance.

If you buy it

Hand wash only; do not use metal utensils or abrasive scouring that degrades the coating over time. Avoid prolonged heating above 400-500°F (check manual for exact spec) to minimize any volatile fume risk if Teflon-type coating is present. Replace the pan if coating shows visible wear, peeling, or scratching that exposes substrate. Store flat and dry to prevent coating adhesion failure.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 35% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
Kitchenaid has made a specific claim

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

Better-graded alternatives in Bakeware

Caraway Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet

Caraway

Nonstick Ceramic Medium Baking Sheet

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ Made Safe
  • ceramic nonstick coating
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Ceramic coating degradation over time
Caraway Ceramic Nonstick Baking Sheet Duo

Caraway

Ceramic Nonstick Baking Sheet Duo

100ExcellentPFAS grade
✓ MADE SAFE Certified
  • ceramic nonstick coating
  • A third party reports verifying it as PFAS-free
  • Coating degradation and durability

2 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

Caraway Nonstick Ceramic Large Baking Sheet

Caraway

Nonstick Ceramic Large Baking Sheet

90ExcellentPFAS grade
  • ceramic nonstick coating
  • The brand calls it PFAS-free, which we have not verified
  • Ceramic coating degradation and particle shedding

3 hazards checked on this product. See all of them.

More bakeware grades

How we score, every product runs through the same public 0-100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.