PFAS75/ 100Excellent
Overall67/ 100Good
MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set

MAC Fix+ · Lipstick

MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set

Excellent

Lower risk for typical cosmetic formula without known PFAS drivers, though brand remains silent on PFAS.

Verdict: BuyLiquid lipstick with standard cosmetic safety profile; no established hazards reported. Brand transparency is limited but product class carries minimal risk.

MAC's liquid lipstick uses pigments, oils, and emollients without documented water-repelling coatings or special additives triggering PFAS use. No water-resistance or extreme-durability claims appear on the product, and MAC publishes no PFAS information.

Check price on Amazon →

We flunk more products than we pass. This one earned its grade. How we grade

Material

liquid/cream lipstick with standard pigments and emollients

Brand disclosure

Brand is silent on PFAS

Lab data

No public lab test

What’s concerning

♾️

Category baseline

PFAS exposure happens more often with clothing products.

80/ 100
♾️

No PFAS disclosure

The company has not publicly discussed PFAS in this product.

85/ 100
⚠️

Fragrance allergens and sensitizers

MAC lipsticks typically contain fragrance compounds, which can trigger contact dermatitis or lip irritation in sensitive individuals. The brand does not disclose fragrance ingredient lists (protected as trade secret under FDA rules), preventing identification of specific sensitizers.

70/ 100
🍳

Coating or formula instability causing separation or contamination

Liquid lipsticks can separate or degrade if stored improperly, potentially allowing bacterial or mold growth. This is a usage and storage issue rather than a manufacturing defect, but users should discard product showing visible separation or odor changes.

70/ 100

What’s reassuring

Safe base material

Made from ceramic, mineral, or natural fiber with no PFAS risk.

100/ 100
🧠

Lead

FDA-approved colorants and iron oxides used in cosmetic-grade lipsticks are subject to purity limits. No recalls or independent testing results flagging MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set for heavy metal exceedance are on record. Risk is theoretical rather than documented.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

1,4-dioxane (industrial contaminant in emulsifiers)

Liquid lipstick formulations may use polysorbate or PEG-based emollients that can harbor 1,4-dioxane as a byproduct of synthesis. No testing data or regulatory action specific to MAC lipsticks exists; this remains a category-level rather than product-specific concern.

95/ 100
💨

Formaldehyde / VOCs

Modern cosmetic preservative systems have largely phased out formaldehyde donors in favor of safer alternatives. MAC, as a major brand, is unlikely to rely on outdated preservatives, but the brand does not confirm this publicly for individual products.

Source: ATSDR
95/ 100

The full breakdown

What it's made of and why it matters

MAC Sleek Satin Lip Set is a liquid or cream-based lipstick formulation using conventional pigments (iron oxides, mica, FD&C approved colorants) suspended in emollients and film-formers typical of the category. These materials are regulated under FDA cosmetic guidelines and have a long safety track record in lip products. The 'satin' finish indicates a matte or semi-matte modifier, usually silica or silicone polymers, which pose no inherent hazard at cosmetic use levels.

The brand's record and disclosure

MAC (Estée Lauder group) does not publicly disclose detailed ingredient sourcing, heavy metal testing, or PFAS avoidance commitments for individual products. The brand has faced no major safety recalls for lipsticks in recent years. MAC does not list certifications such as clean beauty or third-party heavy metal testing on this line, placing it in the mainstream cosmetics transparency tier rather than premium disclosure.

How it compares in its category

Liquid and cream lipsticks are among the lowest-risk cosmetic formats because they are not inhaled and require minimal additive complexity. MAC's formulations align with industry standards; comparable alternatives from Revlon, Charlotte Tilbury, and drugstore brands carry equivalent hazard profiles. Independent heavy metal testing of MAC lipsticks has not been widely published, so relative ranking is difficult; the brand is neither flagged nor distinguished for purity in third-party cosmetic safety reviews.

If you buy it

Store away from direct heat and sunlight to prevent emollient separation or pigment breakdown. Lipsticks typically need replacement every 1-2 years or if the texture changes, separates, or develops an off odor, signs of degradation or bacterial colonization. Avoid using if you have known sensitivities to fragrance or dyes; patch-test if prone to lip irritation. Do not ingest; swallowing small amounts during normal use is low-risk but the product is not formulated for ingestion.

What we don’t know

Basis
Model estimate, 72% confidence, not a lab result
Lab test
None on record for this exact product
Brand statement
MAC Fix+ has made none

Formulations change between production runs, so check the current label. How we grade.

More lipstick grades

How we score: every product runs through the same public 0–100 rubric based on materials, coatings, brand disclosure, lab findings, and recalls. See the full methodology → Spotted a mistake? Report an error.